Cited by

ly described the initial injury and treatment with a strong medical foundation, he ha[d] not provided any medical explanation for the new mention of a ‘neck injury’ and related ‘probable brachial plexopathy’ when neither had been part of the medical record before the 3/30/2021 narrative.” The CAB is not bound to accept any uncontradicted evidence, even expert testimony, Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20 (1992), unless “the complexity of the.

The 7 CAB gave “little weight” to the counselor’s testimony because her opinions, “based upon limited questioning of recruiters and employers[,] did not require any expertise nor did the responses prove persuasive.” The CAB is not bound to accept any uncontradicted evidence, even expert testimony, Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20 (1992), unless “the complexity of the.

to make appropriate findings of fact to support its decision on remand.

RSA 541:13 (1974); see also Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992).

The board’s findings of fact are deemed to be prima facie reasonable, see RSA 541:13 (1974), and this presumption can only be overcome by a showing that there was no competent evidence from which the board could conclude as it did.

Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992); RSA 541:13 (1974).

RSA 541:13; see Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992).

An uncontroverted expert’s testimony may be rejected by the factfinder as long as reasons therefor are clear in the record.

We therefore vacate and remand to the board for a determination of whether the claimant suffers from multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome and, if she does, whether the workplace caused or contributed to the disease.

RSA 541:13 (1974); Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992).

Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992); 3 A. Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 80.23 (1993).

Our task is not to determine whether we would have found differently than did the board, Averill v. Dreher-Holloway, 134 N.H. 469, 472, 593 A.2d 1149, 1151 (1991), or to reweigh the evidence, O’Sullivan, 129 N.H. at 702, 531 A.2d at 716, but rather to determine whether the findings are supported by competent evidence in the record, Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992).

The board’s findings of fact, and decision made pursuant to those findings, will not be disturbed if supported by competent evidence in the record.

Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992); Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assur., 31 Cal.

Appeal of Lambrou, 136 N.H. 18, 20, 609 A.2d 754, 755 (1992); Xydias v. Davidson Rubber Co., 131 N.H. 721, 723-24, 560 A.2d 627, 628 (1989).