Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Gamble v. University System, 610 A.2d 357.
-
Daniel Ro v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Trustees of Dartmouth College Sebastian Lim v. Factory …
N.H. 2021
suming without deciding that law school handbook “set[] out the terms of a contract,” where school did not dispute that issue, but noting that “while courts have treated student handbooks as contracts between students and schools, the question of whether such a document always constitutes a contract is, arguably, an unsettled issue under Massachusetts law”); Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 12 (1992) (noting that the parties agreed that the catalog setting forth the tuition rat
-
Hill-Grant Living Trust v. Kearsarge Lighting Precinct
986 A.2d 662
N.H. 2009
It must set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial.” Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 16-17 (1992).
-
Daniel v. Hawkeye Funding, Ltd. Partnership
843 A.2d 946
N.H. 2004
“The language of a contract is ambiguous if the parties can reasonably differ as to its meaning.” Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 14 (1992) (emphasis added).
-
Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth College
791 A.2d 990
N.H. 2002
We also agree with the trial court that the plaintiffs’ reliance on Gamble v. University System of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 17 (1992), for the proposition that the Act applies to all matters involving colleges and universities, is not appropriate.
-
N.A.P.P. Realty Trust v. CC Enterprises
784 A.2d 1166
N.H. 2001
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 13-14 (1992).
-
Bezanson v. Hampshire Meadows Development Corp.
742 A.2d 112
N.H. 1999
[p]ayments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate [of] Prime [plus] 2%.” “[T]he proper interpretation of a contract is ultimately a question of law for this court, and we will determine the meaning of the contract based on the meaning that would be attached to it by reasonable persons.” Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N. H. 9, 13, 610 A.2d 357, 360 (1992) (quotation omitted).
-
Appeal of the Timberlane Regional School Board
713 A.2d 988
N.H. 1998
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 13, 610 A.2d 357, 360 (1992).
-
Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
713 A.2d 982
N.H. 1998
“As a general rule, the proper interpretation of a contract is ultimately a question of law for this court, and we will determine the meaning of the contract based on the meaning that would be attached to it by reasonable persons.” Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 13, 610 A.2d 357, 360 (1992) (quotation and brackets omitted).
-
New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Franklin
685 A.2d 913
N.H. 1996
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 16, 610 A.2d 357, 362 (1992); see also RSA 491:8-a, IV On this point, we reject the defendants’ argument that the rules of evidence pertaining to expert witness testimony, see N.H. R. Ev.
-
Walsh v. Young
660 A.2d 1139
N.H. 1995
2d Husband and Wife § 288, at 237 (1968); see Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 13, 610 A.2d 357, 360 (1992).
-
Boissonnault v. Bristol Federated Church
642 A.2d 328
N.H. 1994
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 16, 610 A.2d 357, 362 (1992).
-
Dwire v. Sullivan
642 A.2d 1359
N.H. 1994
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 16, 610 A.2d 357, 362 (1992).
-
Sherman v. Mulligan
629 A.2d 778
N.H. 1993
RSA 491:8-a (1983); Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 16, 610 A.2d 357, 362 (1992).
-
Holden Engineering & Surveying, Inc. v. Pembroke Road Realty Trust
628 A.2d 260
N.H. 1993
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 13, 610 A.2d 357, 360 (1992).
-
Gould v. George Brox, Inc.
623 A.2d 1325
N.H. 1993
Gamble v. University of New Hampshire, 136 N.H. 9, 16, 610 A.2d 357, 362 (1992).