Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Akerley v. Hartford Insurance Group, 616 A.2d 511.
-
Chatman v. STRAFFORD COUNTY
42 A.3d 853
N.H. 2012
For instance, “when a vehicle acts as merely the situs of an injury, the causal connection between the injury and the use of the vehicle is too tenuous to support coverage.” Id.; see Akerley v. Hartford Ins.
-
Antosz v. Allain
40 A.3d 679
N.H. 2012
expressed before the enactment of RSA 507:8-h.” See, e.g., Akerley v. Hartford Ins.
- Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Doe 8 A.3d 154 N.H. 2010
-
One Beacon Insurance v. M&M Pizza, Inc.
160 N.H. 638
N.H. 2010
at 472; see also Akerley v. Hartford Ins.
-
One Beacon Ins., LLC v. M & M Pizza, Inc.
8 A.3d 18
N.H. 2010
at 472, 794 A.2d 108; see also Akerley v. Hartford Ins.
-
Hartley v. Electric Insurance
919 A.2d 808
N.H. 2007
Group, 136 N.H. 433, 439 (1992), we were asked to determine whether insurance coverage existed where the policy provided that the injury “must result from” the use of the uninsured motor vehicle.
- Wilson v. Progressive Northern Insurance 868 A.2d 268 N.H. 2005
- Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia Insurance 794 A.2d 108 N.H. 2002
-
Lebroke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance
769 A.2d 392
N.H. 2001
“The interpretation of terms in insurance policies is a question of law for this court to determine.” Akerley v. Hartford Ins.
- Walsh v. Amica Mutual Insurance 685 A.2d 472 N.H. 1996
-
Matarese v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
682 A.2d 258
N.H. 1996
The defendant, on the other hand, contends that the facts of this case more closely resemble those of Akerley v. Hartford Insurance Group, 136 N.H. 433, 616 A.2d 511 (1992).
- Whitcomb v. Peerless Insurance 679 A.2d 575 N.H. 1996
-
Weaver v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
674 A.2d 975
N.H. 1996
Group, 136 N.H. 433, 439, 616 A.2d 511, 515 (1992) (“tenuous connection” with automobile is insufficient); Waseca Mut.
-
Cannon v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
639 A.2d 270
N.H. 1994
We recently explained in Akerley v. Hartford Insurance Group, 136 N.H. 433, 616 A.2d 511 (1992), that “arising out of” a car’s use means “originating from, or growing out of, or flowing from the use.” Id.