DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. Michael, 606 A.2d 1082.

13 citing documents.

  • Appeal of Estate of William Quinn N.H. 2019
    “In a workers’ compensation case, the claimant bears the burden of proof on the issue of causation.” Tzimas v. Coiffures by Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 500 (1992); see also Appeal of Lalime, 141 N.H. 534, 537 (1996) (“To obtain workers’ compensation benefits, a claimant has the initial burden to establish a prima facie case.”).
  • In re Cottrell 48 A.3d 896 N.H. 2012
    Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501 (1992) (The trial court “is free to accept or reject an expert’s testimony in whole or in part, when faced with conflicting expert testimony.” (quotations omitted)).
  • Benkendorf v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 269 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. 2012
  • The LLK TRUST v. Town of Wolfeboro 992 A.2d 666 N.H. 2010
    Tzimas v. Coiffures by Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501 (1992).
  • Sandford v. Town of Wolfeboro 740 A.2d 1019 N.H. 1999
    Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501, 606 A.2d 1082, 1084 (1992).
  • Appeal of Newcomb 690 A.2d 562 N.H. 1997
    Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992).
  • Appeal of Lalime 687 A.2d 994 N.H. 1996
    Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992).
  • Appeal of Sutton 684 A.2d 1346 N.H. 1996
    Tzimas v. Coiffures by Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 500, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992).
  • Appeal of Briggs 138 N.H. 623 N.H. 1994
    Under this test, the petitioner must “prove legal causation, that is, that [his] injury is work-connected, and medical causation, that is, that [his] disability was actually caused by the work-related event.” Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 500, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992) (quotation omitted); see Averill v. Dreher-Holloway, 134 N.H. 469, 472, 593 A.2d 1149, 1151 (1991).
  • Appeal of Briand 644 A.2d 47 N.H. 1994
    Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 500, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992).
  • Appeal of Gamas 642 A.2d 925 N.H. 1994
    Tzimas v. Coiffures by Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992).
  • Appeal of Stetson 639 A.2d 245 N.H. 1994
    Tzimas v. Coiffures by Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 501, 606 A.2d 1082, 1084 (1992).
  • Hallsen v. Seabrook Clam Co. 623 A.2d 225 N.H. 1993
    Tzimas v. Coiffures By Michael, 135 N.H. 498, 500, 606 A.2d 1082, 1083 (1992).