Cited by

State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383 (1992) (quotation omitted).

State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383 (1992) (quotation omitted).

its weight and credibility, and we reject the defendant’s suggestion that merely by adding circles around the parties whom the videographer was following in the video, the videographer “invaded the fact-finding province of the jury.” See State v. Alwardt, 164 N.H. 52, 57 (2012) (stating that witness credibility and weight to be given evidence are matters for the jury to evaluate); State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383 (1992) (observing that State need only establish prima facie case on authentication

While a warrantless arrest is unlawful if not supported by probable cause, id., “the police may temporarily detain a suspect for investigatory purposes, on grounds that do not amount to probable cause to arrest him for the commission of a crime,” State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 380 (1992) (quotation omitted).

Instead, “[t]he contested evidence, if otherwise relevant, should be admitted once a prima facie case has been made on the issue of authentication.” State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383 (1992) (quotation and brackets omitted).

“The proof necessary to connect an evidentiary exhibit to a defendant may be made by circumstantial evidence.” State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383 (1992) (quotation omitted).

State v Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 380 (1992); see also Terry, 392 U.S. at 16.

Quirk v. Town of New Boston, 140 N.H. 124, 131 (1995); see also State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376 (1992).

We will not overturn a trial court’s determination of probable cause unless, when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the decision is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.

State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383, 605 A.2d 1050, 1054 (1992); Ortiz, 966 F.2d at 716.

State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 381, 605 A.2d 1050, 1053 (1992) (investigative stop did not rise to level of arrest even though defendant was handcuffed and detained in police cruiser).

Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 502 (1983); United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554-55 (1980); State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 380, 605 A.2d 1050, 1052 (1992); State v. Brodeur, 126 N.H. 411, 415, 493 A.2d 1134, 1137-38 (1985); Maya, 126 N.H at 595, 493 A.2d at 1143-44.

The “proof necessary to connect an evidentiary exhibit to a defendant may be made by circumstantial evidence.” State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383, 605 A.2d 1050, 1054 (1992) (quotation omitted).

Once the evidence is admitted, the rest is up to the jury.” State v. Reid, 135 N.H. 376, 383, 605 A.2d 1050, 1054 (1992) (citations and quotations omitted).