Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Catalano v. Town of Windham, 578 A.2d 858.
-
Town of Dunbarton v. Michael Guiney
N.H. 2020
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 509 (1990).
-
New Hampshire Right to Life & a. v. Director, New Hampshire Charitable Trusts Unit & a.
143 A.3d 829
N.H. 2016
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 508 (1990) (explaining that “when a trial court reaches the correct result, but on mistaken grounds, [we] will sustain the decision if there are valid alternative grounds to support it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)).
-
Sheehan v. New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic Development
55 A.3d 1031
N.H. 2012
RSA ch. 216-F; see also Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 508 (1990) (“[W]hen a trial court reaches the correct result, but on mistaken grounds, [we] will sustain the decision if there are valid alternative grounds to support it.” (quotation omitted)).
-
Hersh v. Plonski
938 A.2d 98
N.H. 2007
To establish acceptance by public use, the Plonskis had to demonstrate that the paper street was used “not just by the lot owners and their guests.” Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 510 (1990).
-
Green v. Sumner Properties, LLC
873 A.2d 497
N.H. 2005
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 512 (1990).
-
Mahoney v. Town of Canterbury
834 A.2d 227
N.H. 2003
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 509 (1990); Wason v. Nashua, 85 N.H. 192, 198 (1931).
-
State v. Bruce
780 A.2d 1270
N.H. 2001
The trial court also found that the actions of the police were not “maliciously motivated.” This is essentially a finding that the police acted in good faith, cf. Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 508 (1990) *41 and rebuts any suggestion that the State acted with the intent to prejudice the defendant.
-
Bonardi v. Kazmirchuk
776 A.2d 1282
N.H. 2001
See, e.g., Sandford, 143 N.H. at 489; Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 510 (1990); Zivic, 122 N.H. at 815; Ellison, 121 N.H. at 981.
-
Blagbrough v. Town of Wilton
755 A.2d 1141
N.H. 2000
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 508, 578 A.2d 858, 861 (1990).
-
New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Rochester
740 A.2d 135
N.H. 1999
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 511, 578 A.2d 858, 862 (1990).
-
Stevens v. Town of Goshen
683 A.2d 814
N.H. 1996
RSA 229:5, VII provides that Class VI highways include “all highways which have not been maintained and repaired by the town in suitable condition for travel thereon for 5 successive years or *222 more.” See Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 511, 578 A.2d 858, 862-63 (1990).
-
Town of Warren v. Shortt
652 A.2d 140
N.H. 1994
In Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 509, 578 A.2d 858, 861 (1990), we held that a party claiming an easement by prescription must demonstrate more than a showing of public use for twenty years; the public use additionally must be shown to have been adverse.
-
Barksdale v. Town of Epsom
618 A.2d 814
N.H. 1992
Although our analysis could end here, we find additional support for our holding by examining the term “good cause.” We look first at its “plain and ordinary meaning.” See Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 511, 578 A.2d 858, 862 (1990).
-
Long v. Long
611 A.2d 620
N.H. 1992
Catalano v. Town of Windham, 133 N.H. 504, 508, 578 A.2d 858, 861 (1990).