DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 591 A.2d 262.

14 citing documents.

  • Carter Country Club, Inc. v. Carter Community Building Association N.H. 2021
    Ct. App. 2015) (“It is well settled that the intent of the parties determines whether a contract is severable such that the remaining contract provisions will survive even if one or more provisions of the contract are void.”); see also Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 17-19 (1991) (concluding that unenforceable provisions in an employment contract were severable from the remainder of the contract “[d]espite the lack of an explicit severability provision”).
  • Town of Pembroke v. Town of Allenstown 189 A.3d 309 N.H. 2018
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 21 (1991).
  • Holloway Automotive Group v. Steven Giacalone 154 A.3d 1246 N.H. 2017
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 22 (1991).
  • Ellis v. Candia Trailers & Snow Equipment, Inc. 58 A.3d 1164 N.H. 2012
    “[Severability] requires that the parties’ promises and considerations be capable of apportionment, so that each promise and its corresponding consideration is analogous to a separate contract.” Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 18 (1991).
  • Orr v. Goodwin 953 A.2d 1190 N.H. 2008
    We reached a similar conclusion in Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 22-23 (1991).
  • ACAS Acquisitions (Precitech) Inc. v. Hobert 923 A.2d 1076 N.H. 2007
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 8 (1991).
  • Syncom Industries, Inc. v. Wood 920 A.2d 1178 N.H. 2007
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 8 (1991).
  • Merrimack Valley Wood Products, Inc. v. Near 876 A.2d 757 N.H. 2005
    We have stated that “the law does not look with favor upon contracts in restraint of trade or competition.” Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 8 (1991) (quotation omitted).
  • General Linen Services, Inc. v. Franconia Investment Associates, L.P. 842 A.2d 105 N.H. 2004
    In Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1 (1991), we assessed whether a liquidated damages provision was enforceable and held that “where the damage complained of is the loss of a part or the whole of a specific client’s business, such damages, absent additional factors, are not sufficiently difficult to prove to support a claim for liquidated damages.” Id.
  • National Employment Service Corp. v. Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 761 A.2d 401 N.H. 2000
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 8, 591 A.2d 262, 265 (1991).
  • Kalled v. Albee 712 A.2d 616 N.H. 1998
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 17, 591 A.2d 262, 271 (1991); see also Nashua & c. Paper Co. v. Noyes Co., 93 N.H. 348, 351, 41 A.2d 920, 922 (1945).
  • Concord Orthopaedics Professional Ass'n v. Forbes 702 A.2d 1273 N.H. 1997
    Given that restraints on competition must be narrowly tailored as to duration, see Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 8, 591 A.2d 262, 266 (1991), it is likely that the issues raised here will recur but continue to evade review.
  • Harper v. Healthsource New Hampshire, Inc. 674 A.2d 962 N.H. 1996
    See, e.g., Audley v. Melton, 138 N.H. 416, 418, 640 A.2d 777, 779 (1994); Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 8, 17, 591 A.2d 262, 265-66, 271 (1991).
  • Centorr-Vacuum Industries, Inc. v. Lavoie 609 A.2d 1213 N.H. 1992
    Technical Aid Corp. v. Allen, 134 N.H. 1, 12, 591 A.2d 262, 268 (1991).