Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of Adjustment, 543 A.2d 1385.

23 citing documents.

Sullyville, LLC v. Town of Carroll N.H. 2021
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517 (1988) (observing that owner of nonconforming use may willingly relinquish it in order to obtain authorization from planning board to make changes on owner’s land).
Dartmouth Corporation of Alpha Delta v. Town of Hanover 159 A.3d 359 N.H. 2017
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516 (1988).
Patrick Walsh & a. v. Village District of Little Boar's Head N.H. 2017
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 518 (1988) (quotation omitted).
Walter Donovan v. Town of Piermont N.H. 2016
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517 (1988) (“A special exception is a use permitted upon certain conditions as set forth in a town’s zoning ordinance.”); see also RSA 674:33, IV (Supp. 2015).
Bosonetto v. Town of Richmond 48 A.3d 973 N.H. 2012
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516 (1988).
DOVARO 12 ATLANTIC, LLC v. Town of Hampton 965 A.2d 1096 N.H. 2009
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516 (1988).
Severance v. Town of Epsom 923 A.2d 1057 N.H. 2007
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 518 (1988).
McKibbin v. City of Lebanon 816 A.2d 966 N.H. 2003
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517-18 (1988).
Tidd v. Town of Alton 808 A.2d 3 N.H. 2002
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517-18 (1988).
Kelsea v. Town of Pembroke 771 A.2d 587 N.H. 2001
Additionally, the court held that because communications towers are explicitly excepted from the zoning ordinance’s height restrictions, it did not need to apply the common law test discussed in New London Land Use Association v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517 (1988), to determine whether a nonconforming use may be expanded or modified.
Town of Salem v. Wickson 770 A.2d 1120 N.H. 2001
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516 (1988); see N.H. CONST. pt.
Neville v. Highfields Farm, Inc. 744 A.2d 89 N.H. 1999
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 514, 543 A.2d 1385, 1386 (1988).
Hannigan v. City of Concord 738 A.2d 1262 N.H. 1999
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517-18, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988) (ZBA “may not vary.
Hurley v. Town of Hollis 729 A.2d 998 N.H. 1999
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988).
Peabody v. Town of Windham 703 A.2d 886 N.H. 1997
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988).
Conforti v. City of Manchester 677 A.2d 147 N.H. 1996
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 518, 543 A.2d 1385, 1389 (1988) (citations, quotation, brackets, and ellipses omitted).
Geiss v. Bourassa 670 A.2d 1038 N.H. 1996
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988).
Ray's Stateline Market, Inc. v. Town of Pelham 665 A.2d 1068 N.H. 1995
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516-17, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988).
Grey Rocks Land Trust v. Town of Hebron 614 A.2d 1048 N.H. 1992
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988).
Rotter v. Coconino County 818 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1991
Cohen v. Town of Henniker 593 A.2d 1145 N.H. 1991
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 515-17, 543 A.2d 1385, 1387-88 (1988).
Granite State Minerals, Inc. v. City of Portsmouth 593 A.2d 1142 N.H. 1991
A prior discussion of the expansion of nonconforming uses is found in New London Land Use Association v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 543 A.2d 1385 (1988).
Devaney v. Town of Windham 564 A.2d 454 N.H. 1989
v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 516, 543 A.2d 1385, 1387 (1988), has not ordered the plaintiff to raze his camp: “The Court understands that the within order requires plaintiff to remove or demolish a substantial part of his homeplace.” (Emphasis added.)

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by