Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 523 A.2d 16.
-
Tremblay v. Bald
2024 N.H. 6
N.H. 2024
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 816 (1986) (citing Lang v. Johnson, 24 N.H. 302, 307 (1851)).
-
In re Estate of Frederick G. McCaffery
N.H. 2018
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 813 (1986) (“Having acquiesced in the procedure employed, the plaintiffs cannot now object to the form of the proceeding.”).
-
Scott Kukesh & a. v. Beverly P. Mutrie, Individually and as Trustee of the Beverly P. Mutrie Revocable …
168 N.H. 76
N.H. 2015
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 813 (1986).
-
Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.
7 A.3d 1284
N.H. 2010
The trial court may also consider documents attached to the plaintiffs pleadings, see Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 813 (1986), or “documents the authenticity of which are not disputed by the parties.
-
Sirrell v. State
780 A.2d 494
N.H. 2001
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 818-19 (1986) (plaintiffs have burden to prove disproportionality under Part I, Article 12 of New Hampshire Constitution).
-
McGraw v. Exeter Region Cooperative School District
765 A.2d 710
N.H. 2001
“No decision of this Court has extended the ‘one man, one vote’ principle to individuals residing beyond the geographic confines of the governmental entity concerned, be it the State or its political subdivision.” Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 820-21, 523 A.2d 16, 25 (1986) (quotation omitted).
-
Tsiatsios v. Tsiatsios
663 A.2d 1335
N.H. 1995
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 815-16, 523 A.2d 16, 21-22 (1986).
-
Nash Family Investment Properties v. Town of Hudson
660 A.2d 1102
N.H. 1995
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 818, 523 A.2d 16, 23 (1986).
-
Phillips v. Verax Corp.
637 A.2d 906
N.H. 1994
An “ ‘offer must be so definite as to its material terms or require such definite terms in the acceptance that the promises and performances to be rendered by each party are reasonably certain.’” Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 815, 523 A.2d 16, 21 (1986) (quoting RESTATEMENT OF Contracts § 32 (1932)).
-
DiFruscia v. New Hampshire Department of Public Works
612 A.2d 1326
N.H. 1992
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 813, 523 A.2d 16, 20 (1986).
-
Estabrooks v. Town of Jefferson
592 A.2d 1154
N.H. 1991
whether or not it is what justice and convenience require.’” Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 813, 523 A.2d 16, 20 (1986) (quoting Morrill v. Bank, 90 N.H. 358, 359, 9 A.2d 519, 522 (1939)) (holding that plaintiffs had opportunity to argue case because they were heard on motion to dismiss and not denied any request to present evidence).
-
Provencal v. Vermont Mutual Insurance
571 A.2d 276
N.H. 1990
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 814, 523 A.2d 16, 20 (1986).
-
State v. Dandurant
567 A.2d 592
N.H. 1989
We interpret statutes by their plain meaning, Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 819, 523 A.2d 16, 24 (1986), and this broad language includes interrogation.
-
Panto v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.
547 A.2d 260
N.H. 1988
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 815, 523 A.2d 16, 21 (1986).
-
Jay Edwards, Inc. v. Baker
534 A.2d 706
N.H. 1987
It is equally true, however, that a court “need not accept statements in the complaint which are merely conclusions of law.” Chasan v. Village District of Eastman, 128 N.H. 807, 814, 523 A.2d 16, 20 (1986) (quoting Mt.