Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Ellis v. Royal Insurance, 530 A.2d 303.
-
Joseph A. Santos v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
N.H. 2019
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 338 (1987), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Cadell v. XL Specialty Ins.
-
Santos v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.
201 A.3d 1243
N.H. 2019
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 338, 530 A.2d 303 (1987), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Cadell v. XL Specialty Ins.
-
Bartlett v. Commerce Insurance
114 A.3d 724
N.H. 2015
condary insurers, and Commerce *525 (through the Umbrella policy) provides umbrella coverage; (4) if all policies are available to the petitioner, she must exhaust each layer of coverage before a subsequent layer of coverage is triggered; and (5) each insurer required to provide coverage is entitled to a credit to be determined according to the formula articulated in Ellis v. Royal Insurance Co., 129 N.H. 326, 338-39 (1987).
-
Warner v. Clarendon Insurance
910 A.2d 1171
N.H. 2006
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 332-35 (1987) (declining to apply RSA 264:15, I, to an insurance policy neither issued nor delivered in New Hampshire).
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Holyoke Mutual Insurance 841 A.2d 68 N.H. 2004
-
Distinguished
Cecere v. Aetna Insurance
766 A.2d 696
N.H. 2001
Green Mt., 138 N.H. at 10, 634 A.2d at 1013-14; Ellis v. Royal Ins.
-
Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. Ralph
640 A.2d 763
N.H. 1994
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 341, 530 A.2d 303, 312 (1987); Hackman v. American Mut.
-
Marston v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
609 A.2d 745
N.H. 1992
Co., 134 N.H. 196, 198, 589 A.2d 593, 595 (1991) (quoting Ellis v. Royal Inc. Co., 129 N.H. 326, 331, 530 A.2d 303, 306 (1987)); see also Stevens v. Merchants Mut.
-
Lachapelle v. Town of Goffstown
593 A.2d 1152
N.H. 1991
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 334, 530 A.2d 303, 308 (1987) (statute will not be redrafted to meet an intention not expressed in its language).
-
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Allstate Insurance
592 A.2d 515
N.H. 1991
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 334, 530 A.2d 303, 308 (1987) (statute will not be redrafted to meet an intention not expressed in its language).
- Glowski v. Allstate Insurance 589 A.2d 593 N.H. 1991
-
Blanchard v. Blanchard
578 A.2d 339
N.H. 1990
“[W]e will therefore give the unambiguous language of the statute its plain meaning unless and until the legislature sees fit to change it.” Ellis v. Royal Ins.
-
Daniel v. O'Neill
568 A.2d 1189
N.H. 1990
Co., 129 N.H. 326, 340-41, 530 A.2d 303, 312 (1987) (arbitration award entitled to interest from date of award, pursuant to RSA 524:1-b) (citing Hackman v. American Mut.