DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 519 A.2d 297.

15 citing documents.

  • Philip Seekell v. John S. Merrow & a. N.H. 2015
    “In interpreting a deed, we give it the meaning intended by the parties at the time they wrote it, taking into account the surrounding circumstances at that time.” Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765 (1986).
  • Kenneth J. Doerr & a. v. Philip Tuomala & a. N.H. 2015
    We use the rule of reason “to interpret and give reasonable meaning to general or unclear terms in the deed language granting an easement,” but we also use it, “irrespective of the deed language,” to “determine whether a particular use of the easement would be unreasonably burdensome.” Heartz v. City of Concord, 148 N.H. 325, 331 (2002); see Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 766 (1986) (noting that “an easement created by deed is always limited to a reasonable use”).
  • Paul T. Marino v. Christopher Muro N.H. 2015
    at 332, it generally limits easement rights to those rights that are reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the easement, see Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 766 (1986); Sakansky v. Wein, 86 N.H. 337, 339-40 (1933); Bean v. Coleman, 44 N.H. 539, 544 (1863).
  • Village Green Condominium Ass'n v. Hodges 114 A.3d 323 N.H. 2015
    Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765 (1986).
  • Town of Barrington v. Townsend 55 A.3d 952 N.H. 2012
    He argues that because he had moved out of the barn after being served with the cease and desist notice, an injunction was unnecessary and “only accomplished the result of punishing the defendant for past conduct which he had voluntarily remedied.” He asserts, citing Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 764 (1986), that an injunction issued for such a purpose should be vacated.
  • Appletree Mall Associates, LLC v. Ravenna Investment Associates 33 A.3d 1097 N.H. 2011
    Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765 (1986).
  • Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. 2011
  • In Re Guardianship of Phuong Phi Thi Luong 951 A.2d 136 N.H. 2008
    RSA 547:3-b; see also Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 764 (1986) (explaining that “equitable jurisdiction lies only when there is no plain and complete remedy at law”).
  • Blagbrough Family Realty Trust v. a & T Forest Products, Inc. 917 A.2d 1221 N.H. 2007
    Thurston Enters., Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 764 (1986).
  • Arcidi v. Town of Rye 846 A.2d 535 N.H. 2004
    Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765 (1986).
  • Gutbier v. Hannaford Bros. 842 A.2d 64 N.H. 2004
    Reynolds, 71 N.H. at 332; Sands v. Stevens, 121 N.H. 1008, 1011 (1981); see also Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 764 (1986).
  • Flanagan v. Prudhomme 644 A.2d 51 N.H. 1994
    Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro, 137 N.H. 1, 5, 622 A.2d 1238, 1241 (1993); Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765, 519 A.2d 297, 301 (1986).
  • Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro 622 A.2d 1238 N.H. 1993
    Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 764, 519 A.2d 297, 300 (1986).
  • Bisson v. Laconia Investment Properties, Inc. 559 A.2d 1338 N.H. 1989
    Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 765, 519 A.2d 297, 301 (1986).
  • Fischer v. City of Dover 554 A.2d 1293 N.H. 1989
    equitable jurisdiction lies only when there is no plain and complete remedy at law.” Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 764, 519 A.2d 297, 300 (1986); see Sands v. Stevens, 121 N.H. 1008, 1011, 437 A.2d 297, 299-300 (1981).