DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 514 A.2d 1257.

21 citing documents.

  • State v. Crie 913 A.2d 767 N.H. 2007
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 333, 514 A.2d 1257 (1986).
  • State v. Crie 913 A.2d 767 N.H. 2006
    Weldy v. Town, of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 333 (1986).
  • White v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 864 A.2d 1101 N.H. 2004
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330 (1986).
  • Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc. 858 A.2d 536 N.H. 2004
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330 (1986).
  • Nilsson v. Bierman 839 A.2d 25 N.H. 2003
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 334-35 (1986).
  • Estate of Joshua T. v. State 840 A.2d 768 N.H. 2003
    Sintros, 148 N.H. at 480; Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330 (1986).
  • Madeja v. MPB Corp. 821 A.2d 1034 N.H. 2003
    Our standard of review of a trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is “extremely narrow.” Weldy v. Town, of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330 (1986).
  • Kravitz v. Beech Hill Hospital, L.L.C. 808 A.2d 34 N.H. 2002
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330 (1986).
  • Powell v. Catholic Medical Center 749 A.2d 301 N.H. 2000
    In New Hampshire, “[t]he test of due care is what reasonable prudence would require under similar circumstances.” Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330-31, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986).
  • Schneider v. Plymouth State College 744 A.2d 101 N.H. 1999
    is extremely narrow.” Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986).
  • Millis v. Fouts 744 A.2d 81 N.H. 1999
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986).
  • Simonds v. City of Manchester 693 A.2d 69 N.H. 1997
    “We will uphold a denial of these motions where sufficient evidence in the record supports the trial court’s ruling.” Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986).
  • Trull v. Town of Conway 669 A.2d 807 N.H. 1995
    The plaintiffs also argue that pursuant to Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 514 A.2d 1257 (1986), police officers are obligated to protect the general public; because Route 113 is under the exclusive police jurisdiction of the town, their duty to protect the general public extends to safety hazards on State highways.
  • Hickingbotham v. Burke 662 A.2d 297 N.H. 1995
    see Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 331, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986) (finding that former RSA 180:2, now codified at RSA 179:2 (1994), imposes a statutory duty of care upon police officers to arrest teenagers discovered illegally transporting alcohol).
  • Marquay v. Eno 662 A.2d 272 N.H. 1995
    cf. Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330—31, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986).
  • Doucette v. Town of Bristol & a. 635 A.2d 1387 N.H. 1993
    Is the special duty/special relationship test, as recognized by the New Hampshire Supreme Court in Hartman v. Hooksett, 125 N.H. 34 (1984) and Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325 (1986), affected by the erosion of sovereign immunity in Merrill v. Manchester, 114 N.H. 722 (1974) and City of Dover v. Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Company, 133 N.H. 109 (1990)?
  • Caliri v. State 620 A.2d 1028 N.H. 1993
    The test of due care is what reasonable prudence would require under similar circumstances.” Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 330-31, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986) (citation omitted).
  • Island Shores Estates Condominium Ass'n v. City of Concord 615 A.2d 629 N.H. 1992
    We sustain the dismissal of this theory, introduced in the second count, by applying our decision in Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 514 A.2d 1257 (1986).
  • State v. Santana 586 A.2d 77 N.H. 1991
    Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 334-35, 514 A.2d 1257, 1262-63 (1986).
  • Town of Hudson v. Baker 584 A.2d 177 N.H. 1990
    The word “shall” is “a command, which requires mandatory enforcement.” In re Robyn W., 124 N.H. 377, 379, 469 A.2d 1351, 1352 (1983); see also Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 331, 514 A.2d 1257, 1260 (1986).
  • Stewart v. Farrel 554 A.2d 1286 N.H. 1989
    We usually insist that the trial court be given an opportunity to address and rule on issues before they are presented to this court, see Weldy v. Town of Kingston, 128 N.H. 325, 335, 514 A.2d 1257, 1263 (1986), and that we receive the benefit of a complete record, *464 see Appeal of Bosselait, 130 N.H. 604, 607, 547 A.2d 682, 686 (1988), and full briefing and argument, see Daboul supra.