Cited by

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 600 (1986) (observing that decision about whether to lay out certain roads would “require[] the exercise of a high enough order of discretion to justify legal immunity”).

Property Owners Assoc., Inc. v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 597 (1986).

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 598 (1986) (declining to fashion constitutional tort remedy for selectmen’s refusal to lay out roads because statutory law provided adequate remedy, even if selectmen’s refusal reflected intent to discriminate).

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 600 (1986); traffic control and parking regulations, Sorenson v. City of Manchester, 136 N.H. 692, 694 (1993); setting of road maintenance standards and construction of a sidewalk when based upon a city’s faulty plan or design, Gardner [v. City of Concord, 137 N.H. 253, 258, 259 (1993)]

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593 (1986), the trial court ruled that courts disfavor the creation of a common law tort remedy for a constitutional violation, particularly where a statutory remedy exists.

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 600 (1986); the location of parking spaces, Sorenson v. City of Manchester, 136 N.H. 692, 694 (1993); the placement or subsequent abandonment of an alleyway on a certain street in a certain place, Gardner, 137 N.H. at 258; traffic control, Bergeron v. City of Manchester, 140 N.H. 417, 422, 424 (1995); and the traini

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 600 (1986); traffic control and parking regulations, Sorenson v. City of Manchester, 136 N.H. 692, 694 (1993); setting of road maintenance standards and construction of a sidewalk when based upon a city’s faulty plan or design, Gardner, 137 N.H. at 258, 259; traffic control and management of roadway safety, Bergeron

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 602 (1986); Petition of Mone, 143 N.H. 128, 132 (1998).

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 599 (1986) (Rockhouse I); see also Jackson, 126 N.H. at 762; Waisman, 96 N.H. at 53.

In Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 503 A.2d 1385 (1986), we were likewise asked to recognize a new cause of action.

v. Town of North Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 598, 503 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1986); see also N.H. CONST, pt.

Relying on Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Ass’n v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 599-600, 503 A.2d 1385, 1389 (1986) (Merrill immunity barred claim against the town for its refusal to lay out a roadway), and Hurley v. Hudson, 112 N.H. 365, 369, 296 A.2d 905, 907 (1972) (planning board’s approval of subdivision plan was discretionary function for which city could not be held liable), the trial c

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 503 A.2d 1385 (1986), we described the analysis required of a court asked to recognize a new cause of action.

This case has already been before us in Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Association v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 503 A.2d 1385 (1986), where we affirmed the dismissal of counts three and four, seeking damages and mandamus.

v. Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 503 A.2d 1385 (1986) (declining to adopt damages remedy for alleged constitutional torts caused by town’s refusal to lay out roads in subdivision).

v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 602, 503 A.2d 1385, 1390-91 (1986), if “an official is given discretion to decide how to resolve an issue before him, a mandamus order may require him to address the issue, but it cannot require a particular result,” id.