Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 499 A.2d 999.

32 citing documents.

  • Pierson v. Hubbard 802 A.2d 1162 N.H. 2002
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken *762 Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320 (1985); Del Norte, Inc. v. Provencker, 142 N.H. 535, 537 (1997).
  • Bruzga v. PMR Architects, P.C. 693 A.2d 401 N.H. 1997
    “On an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss, the only issue raised is whether the allegations are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Cory., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Higgins v. Colby 674 A.2d 971 N.H. 1996
    When reviewing an order granting a motion to dismiss, we must determine whether the plaintiff’s “allegations are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Richmond v. White Mountain Recreation Ass'n 674 A.2d 153 N.H. 1996
    *757 “We will assume the truth of both the facts alleged in [Richmond’s] pleadings and all reasonable inferences therefrom as construed most favorably to [Richmond].” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Williams v. O'Brien 669 A.2d 810 N.H. 1995
    Although we assume the truth of the plaintiff’s allegations of fact and construe all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985), the pleadings on their face lacked sufficient facts upon which relief may be granted.
  • Dunn v. CLD Paving, Inc. 663 A.2d 104 N.H. 1995
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320-21, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Trahan-Laroche v. Lockheed Sanders, Inc. 657 A.2d 417 N.H. 1995
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Douglas v. Fulis 645 A.2d 76 N.H. 1994
    If the facts as alleged would constitute a basis for legal relief, the motion to dismiss should be denied.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Cross v. Warden 644 A.2d 542 N.H. 1994
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Putnam v. University of New Hampshire 637 A.2d 156 N.H. 1994
    *239 The standard of review in considering a motion to dismiss is “whether the allegations [in the plaintiff’s pleadings] are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Marbucco Corp. v. City of Manchester 632 A.2d 522 N.H. 1993
    “On an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss, the only issue raised is whether the allegations are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Schoff v. City of Somersworth 630 A.2d 783 N.H. 1993
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Murdock v. City of Keene 623 A.2d 755 N.H. 1993
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Sorenson v. City of Manchester 621 A.2d 438 N.H. 1993
    Collectramatic Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Island Shores Estates Condominium Ass'n v. City of Concord 615 A.2d 629 N.H. 1992
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Bonte v. Bonte 616 A.2d 464 N.H. 1992
    On appeal from a motion to dismiss, “[w]e will assume the truth of both the facts alleged in the plaintiff’s pleadings and all reasonable inferences therefrom as construed most favorably to the plaintiff.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Thompson v. Forest 614 A.2d 1064 N.H. 1992
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Witte v. Desmarais 614 A.2d 116 N.H. 1992
    *182 As a preliminary matter, we outline the well-established review standard: “On an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss, the only issue raised is whether the allegations are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quotation omitted).
  • Belcher v. Paine 612 A.2d 1318 N.H. 1992
    Collectramatic v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Real Estate Planners, Inc. v. Town of Newmarket 597 A.2d 78 N.H. 1991
    Under New Hampshire law, we must determine “‘whether the allegations [in REP’s pleadings] are reasonably susceptible of a *701 construction that would permit recovery.’” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quoting Royer Foundry & Mach.
  • Estate of LaRoche v. Doe 594 A.2d 1297 N.H. 1991
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Numerica Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Mountain Lodge Inn, Corp. 596 A.2d 131 N.H. 1991
    If the facts as alleged would constitute a basis for legal relief, the motion to dismiss should be denied.” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quoting Royer Foundry & Mach.
  • Masse v. Commercial Union Insurance 593 A.2d 1164 N.H. 1991
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Towle v. Kiman 591 A.2d 911 N.H. 1991
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Leeman v. Boylan 590 A.2d 610 N.H. 1991
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985); Jarvis v. Prudential Ins.
  • Ferreira v. Bedford School District 584 A.2d 182 N.H. 1990
    “On an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss, ‘the only issue raised is whether the allegations are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.’” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (citation omitted).
  • Provencal v. Vermont Mutual Insurance 571 A.2d 276 N.H. 1990
    We must, as the trial court was required to, determine “whether the allegations [in the plaintiff’s pleadings] are reasonably susceptible of a construction *745 that would permit recovery.” Rounds v. Standex International, 131 N.H. 71, 74, 550 A.2d 98, 100 (1988) (quoting Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985), itself quoting Royer Foundry & Mach.
  • Tyler v. Fuller 569 A.2d 764 N.H. 1990
    s negligently and carelessly affirmatively approved the modification of a table saw without a device designed to prevent the kickback of wood and affirmatively approved the modification of a table saw without a cover guard and performed other negligent acts...” In considering the facts as alleged in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985), the trial court found that the defendants were co-emplo
  • Blue Jay Realty Trust v. City of Franklin 567 A.2d 188 N.H. 1989
    Collectramatic v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Flags I, Inc. v. Kennedy 553 A.2d 778 N.H. 1989
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985).
  • Rounds v. Standex International 550 A.2d 98 N.H. 1988
    We note, first, that the focal issue before either a trial court considering a motion to dismiss, or this court upon review of an order granting such a motion, is “‘whether the allegations [in the plaintiff’s pleadings] are reasonably susceptible of a construction that would permit recovery.’” Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 320, 499 A.2d 999, 1000 (1985) (quoting Royer Foundry & Mach.
  • Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. v. Collectramatic, Inc. 547 A.2d 245 N.H. 1988
    Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp., 127 N.H. 318, 499 A.2d 999 (1985).