DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Roberts v. Ward, 493 A.2d 478.

14 citing documents.

  • In re P.B. 117 A.3d 711 N.H. 2015
    Furthermore, we have long recognized that the rights of parents are natural, essential, and inherent rights to which great judicial deference must be accorded.
  • In the Matter of P.B. & a. and T.W. & a. N.H. 2015
    Furthermore, we have long recognized that the rights of parents are natural, essential, and inherent rights to which great judicial deference must be accorded.
  • In re Guardianship of Madelyn B. 166 N.H. 453 N.H. 2014
    (quotations omitted); cf. Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 392-93 (1985) (noting that “[p]sychiatrists and psychologists unanimously counsel that children should maintain and retain meaningful relationships and that to deny them continuing contacts is a deprivation” (quotation and ellipses omitted)).
  • In Re Rupa 13 A.3d 307 N.H. 2010
    R.A., 153 N.H. at 99; In the Matter of Jeffrey G. & Janette R, 153 N.H. 200, 203 (2006) (“[T]he right of biological and adoptive parents to raise and care for their children is a fundamental liberty interest protected by Part I, Article 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution.”); Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 391 (1985) (concluding that parental rights “have been found to operate against the State, against third parties and *318 against the child” (citation omitted)).
  • In re R.A. 891 A.2d 564 N.H. 2005
    at 547 (quoting Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 391 (1985)).
  • In re Nelson 825 A.2d 501 N.H. 2003
    Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 391 (1985) (citations, quotation and ellipses omitted).
  • Graville v. Dodge 985 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. 1999
  • Petition of Santoro 578 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Bodwell v. Brooks 686 A.2d 1179 N.H. 1996
    “[W]e have made the best interests of the child the beacon by which to guide all custody matters.” Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 392, 493 A.2d 478, 481 (1985).
  • O'Brien v. O'Brien 684 A.2d 1352 N.H. 1996
    We accord great judicial deference to parental rights.
  • Joel v. Wellman 551 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • Ellsworth v. Heath 678 A.2d 138 N.H. 1996
    Moreover, in other cases we have recognized that the superior court is not precluded “from ever entertaining any custody or visitation matters outside of the divorce context.” Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 391, 493 A.2d 478, 480 (1985) (citing Locke v. Ladd, 119 N.H. 136, 399 A.2d 962 (1979)).
  • Olson v. Olson 534 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1995
  • Preston v. Mercieri 573 A.2d 128 N.H. 1990
    Roberts v. Ward, 126 N.H. 388, 493 A.2d 478 (1985); C. DOUGLAS,.3 NEW HAMPSHIRE Practice, Family Law § 242, at 225 (1982 and Supp. 1989).