DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Laliberte, 474 A.2d 1025.

28 citing documents.

  • Island Shores Estates Condominium Ass'n v. City of Concord 615 A.2d 629 N.H. 1992
    City of Berlin v. State, 124 N.H. 627, 630, 474 A.2d 1025, 1027 (1984).
  • State v. Brodowski 600 A.2d 925 N.H. 1991
    “This court has consistently held that we ‘will not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the lower court.’” State v. McAdams, 134 N.H. 445, 447, 594 A.2d 1273, 1273 (1991) (quoting State v. LaLiberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984)); Perron v. City of Somersworth, 131 N.H. 303, 305, 553 A.2d 283, 284 (1988) (axiomatic that matters ignored in the trial court may not be raised on appeal).
  • State v. McAdams 594 A.2d 1273 N.H. 1991
    This court has consistently held that we “will not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the lower court.” State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); see State v. Menard, 133 N.H. 708, 711, 584 A.2d 752, 754 (1990); State v. Cassell, 129 N.H. 22, 24, 523 A.2d 40, 41 (1986).
  • Halliday v. Halliday 593 A.2d 233 N.H. 1991
    Dombrowski v. Dombrowski, 131 N.H. 654, 662, 559 A.2d 828, 833 (1989); State v. Dellorfano, 128 N.H. 628, 632-33, 517 A.2d 1163, 1166 (1986); State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984).
  • State v. Mansfield 592 A.2d 512 N.H. 1991
    State v. Dellorfano, 128 N.H. 628, 632, 517 A.2d 1163, 1166 (1986); State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621-22, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984).
  • State v. Baird 581 A.2d 1313 N.H. 1990
    *640 It is axiomatic “that this court will not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the lower court.” State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); see Tishkevich v. Tishkevich, 131 N.H. 404, 407, 553 A.2d 1324, 1327 (1989); Perron v. City of Somersworth, 131 N.H. 303, 305, 553 A.2d 283, 284 (1988).
  • Kakris v. Montbleau 575 A.2d 1293 N.H. 1990
    We now turn our attention to the question of whether plaintiff’s due process argument was properly raised below, as “it is well established that this court will not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the lower court.” State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); see Topjian Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Bruce Topjian, Inc., 129 N.H. 481, 486, 529 A.2d 391, 394 (1987).
  • State v. Derby 561 A.2d 504 N.H. 1989
    (4), or raised in the trial court, see State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984).
  • State v. Tucker 557 A.2d 270 N.H. 1989
    State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); Daboul v. Town of Hampton, 124 N.H. 307, 309, 471 A.2d 1148, 1149 (1983).
  • State v. Roberts 556 A.2d 302 N.H. 1989
    State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); Daboul v. Town of Hampton, 124 N.H. 307, 309, 471 A.2d 1148, 1149 (1983).
  • State v. Johnson 547 A.2d 213 N.H. 1988
    The defendant claims that we should consider his claim to correct this “manifest error and serious injustice.” As a general rule, we “will not consider grounds of objections not specified or called to the court’s attention at the trial.” State v. Cassell, 129 N.H. 22, 24, 523 A.2d 40, 41 (1986); see, e.g., State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 474 A.2d 1025 (1984); N.H. R. Ev.
  • UniFirst Corp. v. City of Nashua 533 A.2d 372 N.H. 1987
    State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 474 A.2d 1025 (1984); Fowler v. Taylor, 99 N.H. 64, 65-66, 104 A.2d 746, 747 (1954).
  • State v. Duff 532 A.2d 1381 N.H. 1987
    State v. Lillios, 128 N.H. 722, 723, 515 A.2d 1198, 1198 (1986); State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 474 A.2d 1025 (1984).
  • Topjian Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Bruce Topjian, Inc. 529 A.2d 391 N.H. 1987
    We need not consider an issue on appeal that has not been raised below.
  • State v. Cassell 523 A.2d 40 N.H. 1986
    Plante v. Manchester, 83 N.H. 57, 59, 138 A. 314, 315 (1927); State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); N.H. R. Ev.
  • State v. Lillios 522 A.2d 986 N.H. 1986
    As we stated in State v. Laliberte, we will “not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the lower court.” State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d *724 1025, 1025 (1984); State v. Shannon, 125 N.H. 653, 657, 484 A.2d 1164, 1168 (1984).
  • State v. Place 513 A.2d 321 N.H. 1986
    Daboul v. Town of Hampton, 124 N.H. 307, 309, 471 A.2d 1148, 1149 (1983); see also State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984); State v. Breest, 115 N.H. 504, 505-06, 345 A.2d 391, 392 (1975).
  • State v. Mallar 508 A.2d 1070 N.H. 1986
    State v. Shannon, 125 N.H. 653, 657, 484 A.2d 1164, 1168 (1984); State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621-22, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984).
  • State v. Dayutis 498 A.2d 325 N.H. 1985
    It is well established that this court will not consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented in the lower court.
  • John H. v. Brunelle 500 A.2d 350 N.H. 1985
    Opinion of the Justices, 126 N.H. 554, 493 A.2d 1182 (1985); City of Berlin v. State, 124 N.H. 627, 632-33, 474 A.2d 1025, 1028 (1984); see also RSA 99-D:l (Supp. 1983); RSA 491:8.
  • State v. Cote 493 A.2d 1170 N.H. 1985
    No such issue is therefore before us. State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 621, 474 A.2d 1025, 1025 (1984).
  • State v. Cote 493 A.2d 459 N.H. 1985
    State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 474 A.2d 1025 (1984); Daboul v. Town of Hampton, 124 N.H. 307, 309, 471 A.2d 1148, 1149 (1983).
  • Tilton v. Dougherty 493 A.2d 442 N.H. 1985
    City of Berlin v. State, 124 N.H. 627, 630, 474 A.2d 1025, 1027 (1984).
  • State v. Marshall 489 A.2d 1144 N.H. 1985
    Accordingly, the defendant has waived his right to raise this argument on appeal.
  • State v. Kilgus 484 A.2d 1208 N.H. 1984
    This court will not consider the defendant’s argument that the State is estopped from charging the defendant with witness tamper *742 ing under RSA 641:5,1(a) because this defense was not raised below.
  • State v. Shannon 484 A.2d 1164 N.H. 1984
    It is well settled in this State, however, that arguments not presented below may not be raised on appeal.
  • State v. Wong 486 A.2d 262 N.H. 1984
    the validity of the trial court’s jury instruction on the State’s burden of proof with respect to the defendant’s blood alcohol content at the time of the collision was not raised below and will not be addressed on appeal.
  • Chagnon Lumber Co. v. Stone Mill Construction Corp. 474 A.2d 588 N.H. 1984
    While issues on appeal are limited to issues raised in the trial court, State v. Laliberte, 124 N.H. 621, 474 A.2d 1025 (1984), we do not restrict a party only to authorities cited at trial.