Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Ball, 471 A.2d 347.

698 citing documents.

American Federation of Teachers – New Hampshire & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a. 167 N.H. 294 N.H. 2015
We first address the parties’ arguments under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Elizabeth Cloutier 167 N.H. 254 N.H. 2015
We first consider the defendant’s argument under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Charles Glenn, Jr. 167 N.H. 171 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s double jeopardy claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
Professional Fire Fighters of New Hampshire & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a. 167 N.H. 188 N.H. 2014
We first address the State’s argument under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Myles Webster 166 N.H. 783 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claims under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Timothy McKenna 166 N.H. 671 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLC d/b/a FairPoint Communications-NNE v. City of Concord 166 N.H. 653 N.H. 2014
“deliberately cho[osing] not to assess a right of way tax against Comcast, meaning [the City] intended not to tax Comcast”; and (3) “fail[ing] to tax other right of way users, such as PSNH and [other] [a]ttachees, deliberately or through deliberate ignorance.” We first address FairPoint’s equal protection claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Catherine Bailey & a. 166 N.H. 537 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendants’ claims under the State Constitution, and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Barion Perry 166 N.H. 297 N.H. 2014
State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231-33 (1983); see State v. Howell, 158 N.H. 717, 719 (2009).
State of New Hampshire v. Robert Letoile, Jr. 166 N.H. 269 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claims under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Theadore Mitchell 166 N.H. 288 N.H. 2014
Following our standard practice, we first consider the defendant’s arguments under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
The State of New Hampshire v. Thomas Jur 94 A.3d 283 N.H. 2014
We first address his claims under the State Constitution, and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
David Montenegro v. New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles 93 A.3d 290 N.H. 2014
We first address the petitioner’s claims under our State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231-32 (1983), and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis, id.
State of New Hampshire v. Gregory Collins 91 A.3d 1208 N.H. 2014
We first address his claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-Moore 91 A.3d 619 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. David Pyles 90 A.3d 1228 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claim under the 2 State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Joshua Sprague 86 A.3d 700 N.H. 2014
As a result, he contends that the instruction unfairly prejudiced his defense because it “made clear the forbidden use of the ‘perception of a gun’ evidence (self-defense) without clarifying its permissible use (mental state defense).” We first address the defendant's claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Kurt Carpentino 85 A.3d 906 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Barion Perry 85 A.3d 917 N.H. 2014
We first address his claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State of New Hampshire v. Richard Gness 85 A.3d 382 N.H. 2014
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.” State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231-33 (1983).
Appeal of the Local Government Center, Inc. & a . 85 A.3d 388 N.H. 2014
We first address the respondents’ arguments under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Thompson 83 A.3d 388 N.H. 2013
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Lantagne 83 A.3d 397 N.H. 2013
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Durgin 82 A.3d 902 N.H. 2013
Following our standard practice, we first consider the defendant’s arguments under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Fischer 82 A.3d 891 N.H. 2013
We first address the issue under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Cheney 82 A.3d 218 N.H. 2013
We first consider the defendant’s argument under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Addison 165 N.H. 381 N.H. 2013
*419 Where the defendant claims a violation of both the State and Federal Constitutions, we first address his claims under the State Constitution, and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Tabaldi 77 A.3d 1124 N.H. 2013
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Dalton 75 A.3d 1140 N.H. 2013
We first address the issues under the State Constitution and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
Appeal of Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLC 75 A.3d 1102 N.H. 2013
We first consider the argument under the State Constitution and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Bisbee 69 A.3d 95 N.H. 2013
We first consider the defendant’s argument under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Mercier 66 A.3d 1242 N.H. 2013
We first address the defendant’s arguments under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231-32 (1983), and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis, id.
State v. Gribble 66 A.3d 1194 N.H. 2013
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Russo 62 A.3d 798 N.H. 2013
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Bell 58 A.3d 665 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s argument under the State Constitution and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Gibbs 58 A.3d 656 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s argument under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid our analysis.
State v. Perri 164 N.H. 400 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s argument under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231-32 (1983), and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis, id.
State v. Biondolillo 55 A.3d 1034 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claims under the State Constitution, and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Saunders 55 A.3d 1014 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Schulz 55 A.3d 933 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s arguments under the State Constitution and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Ball 53 A.3d 603 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Hollenbeck 53 A.3d 591 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution and rely upon federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Alwardt 53 A.3d 545 N.H. 2012
Following our standard practice, we first consider the defendant’s arguments under the State Constitution, referencing federal decisions to aid our analysis only.
State v. Davies 53 A.3d 517 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution, and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Marchand 164 N.H. 26 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231 (1983), and cite federal opinions for guidance only.
State v. Town 48 A.3d 966 N.H. 2012
We first address his claims under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231 (1983), and cite federal opinions for guidance only.
In re C.M. 48 A.3d 942 N.H. 2012
*772 We address this question first under the State Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231 (1983), and cite federal opinions for guidance only.
City of Manchester v. Secretary of State 48 A.3d 864 N.H. 2012
Because the petitioners have articulated claims only under the State Constitution, to the extent that we rely upon federal law, we do so solely to aid our analysis.
State v. Willey 44 A.3d 431 N.H. 2012
We first address the parties’ arguments under the State Constitution and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.
State v. Ortiz 44 A.3d 425 N.H. 2012
We first address the defendant’s claim under the State Constitution, and rely on federal law only to aid in our analysis.