DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Cyr, 453 A.2d 1315.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Richardson 679 A.2d 565 N.H. 1996
    The issue is not what evidence the State might have produced, but rather whether in the context of all the evidence in this case, the State presented evidence sufficient to exclude all rational conclusions except guilt.
  • State v. Bissonnette 635 A.2d 468 N.H. 1993
    State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159-60, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982); see also State v. Blow, 135 N.H. 640, 641-42, 608 A.2d 1309, 1311 (1992).
  • State v. McCue 589 A.2d 580 N.H. 1991
    State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1160, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982); State v. Danskin, 122 N.H. 817, 818, 451 A.2d 396, 397 (1982).
  • State v. Cartier 575 A.2d 347 N.H. 1990
    The defendant maintains nonetheless that the evidence, even viewed most favorably to the State, see State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982), fails to point beyond a reasonable doubt to him, not Jarosz, either as possessor or as dealer.
  • State v. Guglielmo 544 A.2d 25 N.H. 1987
    State v. Danskin, 122 N.H. 817, 818, 451 A.2d 396, 397 (1982); State v. Wong, 125 N.H. 610, 624, 486 A.2d 262, 271 (1984); State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1160, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982).
  • State v. LaRose 497 A.2d 1224 N.H. 1985
    A determination regarding the admissibility of an out-of-court identification involves a two-step analysis.
  • State v. Woodman 480 A.2d 169 N.H. 1984
    In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, “we will view the evidence in the light most.favorable to the prosecution.” State v. Cobb, 123 N.H. 536, 540, 465 A.2d 1203, 1206 (1983); see State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982).
  • State v. Plaut 474 A.2d 587 N.H. 1984
    As with any *814 sufficiency of the evidence claim, this court on review will overturn a verdict only if “no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159-60, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324-25 (1979).
  • State v. Sliz 469 A.2d 1357 N.H. 1983
    We must uphold the jury’s verdict in this case, unless “‘no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. Cobb, 123 N.H. 536, 540, 465 A.2d 1203, *392 1206 (1983) (quoting State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159-60, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982)).
  • State v. Meloon 469 A.2d 1316 N.H. 1983
    State v. Cobb, 123 N.H. 536, 540, 465 A.2d 1203, 1206 (1983); State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982).
  • State v. Sands 467 A.2d 202 N.H. 1983
    State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159-60, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324 (1979).
  • State v. Cobb 465 A.2d 1203 N.H. 1983
    State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982); State v. Goupil, 122 N.H. 857, 859, 451 A.2d 1284, 1286 (1982).
  • State v. Hopps 465 A.2d 1206 N.H. 1983
    State v. Cobb, 123 N.H. 536, 540, 465 A.2d 1203, 1206 (1983); State v. Cyr, 122 N.H. 1155, 1159, 453 A.2d 1315, 1318 (1982).