Cited by

at 335-36, 338; see also Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 368 (1982).

Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 368 (1982) (Reciprocal servitudes created by developer are “binding upon purchasers.

[A] holder of a valid equitable servitude may obtain an injunction against a violation of the imposed restriction.” Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 368, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982) (citations omitted).

Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 368, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982); Carroll v. Schechter, 112 N.H. 216, 219, 293 A.2d 324, 326 (1972).

We will not disturb the findings of the master unless they are unsupported by the evidence or are erroneous as a matter of law.

is a matter within the sound discretion of the Court exercised upon a consideration of all the circumstances of each case and controlled by established principles of equity.” Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 368, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982) (quoting Varney v. Fletcher, 106 N.H. 464, 467-68, 213 A.2d 905, 908 (1965)).

The trial judge has discretion to determine whether the principles of equity mandate the granting of an injunction in the circumstances of a particular case.

Our review of the superior court’s decision is limited in that we will not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court unless the findings and rulings “‘are unsupported by the evidence or are erroneous as a matter of law.’ ” Taylor v. Davidson Rubber Co., 122 N.H. 428, 432, 445 A.2d 1119, 1121 (1982) (quoting Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 369, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982)).

Hynes v. Whitehouse, 120 N.H. at 420, 415 A.2d at 877-78; rather we will uphold them unless they are *279 unsupported by the evidence or erroneous as a matter of law.

Our review of the master’s findings is limited to whether he erred as a matter of law or abused his discretion.

This court will not substitute its judgment for that of a trial court, unless the court’s rulings and findings are unsupported by the evidence or are erroneous as a matter of law.

Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 368, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982); see Town of Harrisville v. Clooney, 122 N.H. 586, 587, 448 A.2d 381, 382 (1982).

To prevail, the plaintiffs must rely on the theory of an equitable reciprocal servitude.

It is well settled that our scope of review in cases such as this is limited.

Our review of the record is limited in that we will not substitute our judgment for the master’s judgment unless his findings and rulings “are unsupported by the evidence or are erroneous as a matter of law.” Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 369, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982); Campo v. Maloney, 122 N.H. 162, 168, 442 A.2d 997, 1001 (1982).

Gauthier v. Robinson, 122 N.H. 365, 369, 444 A.2d 564, 566 (1982); Campo v. Maloney, 122 N.H. 162, 168, 442 A.2d 997, 1001 (1982).