DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 448 A.2d 431.

13 citing documents.

  • Douglas v. Douglas 728 A.2d 215 N.H. 1999
    It is well settled that we will not disturb a ruling on default absent a clear abuse of discretion or error of law.
  • Lachapelle v. Town of Goffstown 593 A.2d 1152 N.H. 1991
    “The decision to strike a default is within the trial court’s discretion and will not be disturbed unless the court clearly abused its discretion or erred as a matter of law.” Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 673, 448 A.2d 431, 434 (1982).
  • State v. Tselios 593 A.2d 243 N.H. 1991
    We begin our analysis by noting that this court will not disturb a default judgment unless the trial court clearly abused its discretion or erred as a matter of law.
  • Edward Nash & Sons, Inc. v. Starbird 571 A.2d 285 N.H. 1990
    It is settled law that “a judgment ought not to pass against any [person] in any proceeding without notice, and an opportunity to show cause against it.” Fillmore v. Fillmore, 114 N.H. 303, 305, 319 A.2d 291, 292 (1974) (quoting Currier v. Gilman, 55 N.H 364, 370 (1875)); see Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 672, 448 A.2d 431, 434 (1982); Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr.
  • State v. Grondin 563 A.2d 435 N.H. 1989
    at 464, 481 A.2d at 823 (citing Paragon Homes Inc. v. Gagnon, 110 N.H. 279, 266 A.2d 207 (1970); Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 448 A.2d 431 (1982) (setting aside default judgment)).
  • Appeal of Concord Steam Corp. 543 A.2d 905 N.H. 1988
    City of Claremont v. Truell, 126 N.H. 30, 35, 489 A.2d 581, 585 (1985); Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 672, 448 A.2d 431, 434 (1982).
  • Hudson v. Musor 519 A.2d 319 N.H. 1986
    The decision to strike a default is ordinarily within the trial court’s discretion, Brodowski v. Supowitz, 122 N.H. 694, 448 A.2d 430 (1982), and will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion or error as a matter of law, Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 448 A.2d 431 (1982).
  • Jamieson, Inc. v. Copeland Coating Co. 489 A.2d 613 N.H. 1985
    It is well established that this court will not disturb a decision denying a motion to strike a default judgment unless the trial court clearly abused its discretion, or erred as a matter of law.
  • City of Claremont v. Truell 489 A.2d 581 N.H. 1985
    Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950); Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 672-73, 448 A.2d 431, 434 (1982).
  • Shortlidge v. Gutoski 484 A.2d 1083 N.H. 1984
    RSA 510:13 allows an individual, when bringing an action against an unincorporated association, to treat that association as an entity — by filing suit against the association in its assumed name and by serving process “upon any officer thereof, or, if it has no officer, then upon any 2 members thereof.” See Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 672, 448 A.2d 431, 433 (1982).
  • North Star Legal Foundation v. Honeywell Project 355 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Lemire 481 A.2d 820 N.H. 1984
    See, e.g., Paragon Homes, Inc. v. Gagnon, 110 N.H. 279, 266 A.2d 207 (1970); see also Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 448 A.2d 431 (1982) (setting aside default judgment).
  • Appeal of Clement 471 A.2d 1193 N.H. 1984
    Realty, Inc. v. City of Rochester, 118 N.H. 778, 780, 394 A.2d 317, 319 (1978); see Sununu v. Clamshell Alliance, 122 N.H. 668, 672-73, 448 A.2d 431, 434 (1982); see also Whisenhunt v. Spradlin, 701 F.2d 470 (5th Cir.), cert.