DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Martin, 437 A.2d 308.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. Herrick 582 A.2d 613 N.H. 1990
    State v. Sadvari, 123 N.H. 410, 413, 462 A.2d 102, 103-04 (1983); State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981).
  • State v. Cote 530 A.2d 775 N.H. 1987
    Unless the defendant is able to establish that no reasonable trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime charged, the conviction must stand.
  • State v. Brown 517 A.2d 831 N.H. 1986
    State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324 (1979).
  • State v. Bemis 503 A.2d 789 N.H. 1985
    We will deem the evidence insufficient only if “‘no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a rea *492 sonable doubt.’” Id.
  • State v. LaRose 497 A.2d 1224 N.H. 1985
    The evidence adduced at trial is insufficient to support the verdict only if ‘“no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1034, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324 (1979)).
  • State v. O'Flynn 496 A.2d 348 N.H. 1985
    In considering the defendant’s claim, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State.
  • State v. Barry 484 A.2d 1155 N.H. 1984
    In considering the merits of the defendant’s claim, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State.
  • State v. Holt 474 A.2d 1031 N.H. 1984
    We will then deem the evidence insufficient only “if ‘no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1034, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, supra at 324).
  • State v. Hamel 466 A.2d 555 N.H. 1983
    State v. Sadvari, 123 N.H. 410, 413, 462 A.2d 102, 103 (1983); State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981).
  • State v. Goupil 451 A.2d 1284 N.H. 1982
    State v. Glidden, 122 N.H. 41, 50, 441 A.2d 728, 733 (1982); State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981); State v. Gilbert, 121 N.H. 305, 313, 429 A.2d 323, 329 (1981).
  • Followed State v. Danskin 451 A.2d 396 N.H. 1982
    As this court has stated in State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981), “[i]n determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we follow the test set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), that the evidence is insufficient if ‘no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” (Citations omitted.)
  • State v. Burke 448 A.2d 962 N.H. 1982
    Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981); State v. Goodwin, 118 N.H. at 866-67, 395 A.2d at 1237.
  • State v. Francoeur 445 A.2d 1095 N.H. 1982
    Viewing all of the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, we conclude that on the evidence presented no trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was in possession of the controlled drugs in violation of RSA 318-B:26 1(a)(1) (Supp. 1981).
  • State v. Janvrin 441 A.2d 1144 N.H. 1982
    State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1034, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981); State v. Gilbert, 121 N.H. 305, 313, 429 A.2d 323, 329 (1981).
  • State v. Thresher 442 A.2d 578 N.H. 1982
    In judging *73 the sufficiency of the evidence, this court will view the facts in the light most favorable to the prosecution in determining whether “no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981) (citations omitted); State v. Gilbert, 121 N.H. 305, 313, 429 A.2d 323, 329 (1981); see Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324 (1979).
  • State v. Arillo 441 A.2d 1163 N.H. 1982
    Considering all the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the State, State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1034, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981); State v. Gilbert, 121 N.H. 305, 313, 429 A.2d 323, 329 (1981), we are satisfied that a jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not reasonably believe the force he used was “necessary to prevent.
  • State v. Bird 440 A.2d 441 N.H. 1982
    State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1034, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318-19 (1979).