DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Gowen v. Brothers, 430 A.2d 159.

16 citing documents.

  • Akwa Vista, LLC v. NRT, INC. 8 A.3d 97 N.H. 2010
    I. JNOV A motion for JNOV relates to the sufficiency of the evidence and presents a question of law.
  • MacKenzie v. Linehan 969 A.2d 385 N.H. 2009
    A motion for JNOV based upon the sufficiency of the evidence presents a question of law.
  • Slattery v. Norwood Realty, Inc. 765 A.2d 143 N.H. 2000
    “The trial judge has very little discretion, when deciding whether to grant the motion for judgment n.o.v.” Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 380, 430 A.2d 159, 161 (1981).
  • St-Laurent v. Fiermonti Oldsmobile, Inc. 611 A.2d 638 N.H. 1992
    A motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, presents an issue only of law.
  • State v. O'Neill 589 A.2d 999 N.H. 1991
    is required because of the insufficiency of the evidence is a question of law, Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 380, 430 A.2d 159, 161 (1981); Muzzy v. Rockingham County Trust Co., 113 N.H. 520, *185 521, 309 A.2d 893, 893-94 (1973).
  • Aubert v. Aubert 529 A.2d 909 N.H. 1987
    Although it is true that causation normally is an issue for the jury to decide, see Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 430 A.2d 159 (1981), *429 in this case the issue of causation was, we think, necessarily decided in the earlier criminal case.
  • Morrill v. Tilney 519 A.2d 293 N.H. 1986
    The jury was free to accept or reject this testimony, in whole or in part.
  • Town of Hudson v. Wynott 522 A.2d 974 N.H. 1986
    In other words, that was all they could possibly do for my back.” The plaintiffs contend that Dr. Grillo’s testimony, although uncontradicted, was of dubious value because it was based in large part on the claimant’s complaints of pain and discomfort, see Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 380, 430 A.2d 159, 160-61 (1981).
  • State v. Sheedy 480 A.2d 887 N.H. 1984
    Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 380, 430 A.2d 159, 160 (1981); see Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 118 N.H. 493, 498, 389 A.2d 429, 433 (1978).
  • Saltzman v. Saltzman 475 A.2d 1 N.H. 1984
    The credibility and weight to be given this evidence, in view of the conflicting evidence from other eyewitnesses, were for the jury to decide.
  • Lahey v. Shaw 466 A.2d 911 N.H. 1983
    Jacques v. Paquin, 122 *653 N.H. 868, 869, 451 A.2d 1283, 1284 (1982); Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 381, 430 A.2d 159, 161 (1981).
  • Croteau v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 461 A.2d 111 N.H. 1983
    Brigham v. Hudson Motors, Inc., 118 N.H. 590, 593-95, 392 A.2d 130, 133-34 (1978) (decision to set aside verdict and grant new trial lies within discretion of trial judge and will not be overturned absent abuse of discretion; improper argument by counsel alone may be sufficient grounds); see Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 381, 430 A.2d 159, 161 (1981).
  • Jacques v. Paquin 451 A.2d 1283 N.H. 1982
    Co. of N.H., 121 N.H. 956, 958, 437 A.2d 263, 265 (1981); Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 381, 430 A.2d 159, 161 (1981); Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 118 N.H. 493, 496-97, 389 A.2d 429, 431-32 (1978).
  • Bouthiette v. Wiggin 451 A.2d 368 N.H. 1982
    Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 380, 430 A.2d 159, 160-61 (1981); see Appeal of Barrington Educ.
  • Appeal of Barrington Education Ass'n 437 A.2d 718 N.H. 1981
    *954 Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 380, 430 A.2d 159, 160-61 (1981); State v. Rullo, 120 N.H. 149, 152, 412 A.2d 1009, 1011 (1980).
  • Rogers v. Pub. Serv. Co. of NH 437 A.2d 263 N.H. 1981
    Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 118 N.H. 493, 496-97, 389 A.2d 429, 431-32 (1978); see Gowen v. Brothers, 121 N.H. 377, 381, 430 A.2d 159, 161 (1981); Automated Housing Corp. v. First Equity Asso’s., Inc., 121 N.H. 177, 180, 428 A.2d 886, 888 (1981).