Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 392 A.2d 587.

13 citing documents.

  • New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic Development v. Dow 803 A.2d 581 N.H. 2002
    Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25 (1978).
  • State v. Johnson 595 A.2d 498 N.H. 1991
    The language in former RSA chapter 630 is exclusive; it explicitly implements the sentencing procedure only when a conviction is determined by “the jury.” Courts have no right to redraft legislation to make it conform to an intention not fairly expressed therein.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 625, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
  • Young v. Prevue Products, Inc. 534 A.2d 714 N.H. 1987
    Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 625-26, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978) (injury in 1972).
  • Appeal of Berlin Education Association, NHEA/NEA 485 A.2d 1038 N.H. 1984
    Ass’n, 120 N.H. 32, 35, 411 A.2d 156, 159 (1980) (quoting Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978)).
  • Caswell v. BCI Geonetics, Inc. 437 A.2d 321 N.H. 1981
    “The legislature must be presumed to know the meaning of words, and to have used the words of a statute advisedly.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
  • In Re Heather D. 431 A.2d 789 N.H. 1981
    Sec., 121 N.H. 74, 77, 426 A.2d 34, 36 (1981) (quoting Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978)).
  • Sant Bani Ashram, Inc. v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security 426 A.2d 34 N.H. 1981
    It is not our function to speculate upon any supposed intention not appropriately expressed in the act itself.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978) (citations omitted).
  • Appeal of Keene State College Education Ass'n, NHEA/NEA 411 A.2d 156 N.H. 1980
    In Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 392 A.2d 587 (1978), we said that “[w]here the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, the statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning.” There is no ambiguity in RSA 273-A:2; the board’s total membership must be balanced between management and labor, but no such balance is require
  • Prive v. M. W. Goodell Construction Co. 409 A.2d 1149 N.H. 1979
    Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 625, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
  • Dupont v. Chagnon 408 A.2d 408 N.H. 1979
    “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, the statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
  • Blais v. Town of Goffstown 406 A.2d 295 N.H. 1979
    Generally “the intention of the legislature as expressed in the statute is the touchstone to its meaning.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
  • DePaolo v. Spaulding Fibre Co. 397 A.2d 1048 N.H. 1979
    Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 392 A.2d 587 (1978).
  • Holland v. New Hampshire Board of Chiropractic Examiners 396 A.2d 556 N.H. 1979
    Ahern v. Laconia Country Club Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978), and not as mere surplusage.