Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 392 A.2d 587.
-
New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic Development v. Dow
803 A.2d 581
N.H. 2002
Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25 (1978).
-
State v. Johnson
595 A.2d 498
N.H. 1991
The language in former RSA chapter 630 is exclusive; it explicitly implements the sentencing procedure only when a conviction is determined by “the jury.” Courts have no right to redraft legislation to make it conform to an intention not fairly expressed therein.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 625, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
-
Young v. Prevue Products, Inc.
534 A.2d 714
N.H. 1987
Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 625-26, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978) (injury in 1972).
-
Appeal of Berlin Education Association, NHEA/NEA
485 A.2d 1038
N.H. 1984
Ass’n, 120 N.H. 32, 35, 411 A.2d 156, 159 (1980) (quoting Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978)).
-
Caswell v. BCI Geonetics, Inc.
437 A.2d 321
N.H. 1981
“The legislature must be presumed to know the meaning of words, and to have used the words of a statute advisedly.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
-
In Re Heather D.
431 A.2d 789
N.H. 1981
Sec., 121 N.H. 74, 77, 426 A.2d 34, 36 (1981) (quoting Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978)).
-
Sant Bani Ashram, Inc. v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security
426 A.2d 34
N.H. 1981
It is not our function to speculate upon any supposed intention not appropriately expressed in the act itself.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624-25, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978) (citations omitted).
-
Appeal of Keene State College Education Ass'n, NHEA/NEA
411 A.2d 156
N.H. 1980
In Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 392 A.2d 587 (1978), we said that “[w]here the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, the statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning.” There is no ambiguity in RSA 273-A:2; the board’s total membership must be balanced between management and labor, but no such balance is require
-
Prive v. M. W. Goodell Construction Co.
409 A.2d 1149
N.H. 1979
Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 625, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
-
Dupont v. Chagnon
408 A.2d 408
N.H. 1979
“Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, the statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
-
Blais v. Town of Goffstown
406 A.2d 295
N.H. 1979
Generally “the intention of the legislature as expressed in the statute is the touchstone to its meaning.” Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978).
-
DePaolo v. Spaulding Fibre Co.
397 A.2d 1048
N.H. 1979
Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 392 A.2d 587 (1978).
-
Holland v. New Hampshire Board of Chiropractic Examiners
396 A.2d 556
N.H. 1979
Ahern v. Laconia Country Club Inc., 118 N.H. 623, 624, 392 A.2d 587, 588 (1978), and not as mere surplusage.