DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 392 A.2d 582.

20 citing documents.

  • Motorsports Holdings, LLC v. Town of Tamworth 993 A.2d 189 N.H. 2010
    Compelling planning boards to adequately state grounds for disapproval therefore anticipates an express written record that sufficiently apprises an applicant of the reasons for disapproval and enables “a reviewing authority [to] hold the board accountable.” Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 619 (1978) (decided under former statute); see also K & P, Inc. v. Town of Plaistow, 133 N.H. 283,290 (1990) (decided under current statute).
  • Mansur v. Muskopf 977 A.2d 1041 N.H. 2009
    RSA 514:8,:9 (2007); Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621 (1978) (“[N]ot all procedural irregu *227 lari tips require a reviewing court to set aside an administrative decision; material prejudice to the complaining party must be shown”).
  • Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of Conway 745 A.2d 481 N.H. 2000
    Term, Trustee v. 889 Associates, Ltd., 127 N.H. 321, 330, 500 A.2d 366, 372 (1985); see Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 586 (1978) (“not all procedural irregularities require a reviewing court to set aside an administrative decision; material prejudice to the complaining party must be shown”); cf. RSA 676:4, IV (1996) (planning board’s actions reversed for procedural defects only when “defects create serious impair
  • Ettlingen Homes, Inc. v. Town of Derry 681 A.2d 97 N.H. 1996
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978).
  • Quirk v. Town of New Boston 663 A.2d 1328 N.H. 1995
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978) (planning board approval of subdivision plan).
  • Attitash Mountain Service Co. v. Schuck 605 A.2d 1067 N.H. 1992
    Co., 120 N.H. 90, 94, 411 A.2d 1107, 1109 (1980) (requirement that error is not reversible unless prejudicial applies to agency decisions); Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 586 (1978).
  • Zukis v. Town of Fitzwilliam 604 A.2d 956 N.H. 1992
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978).
  • K & P, Inc. v. Town of Plaistow 575 A.2d 804 N.H. 1990
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 619-20, 392 A.2d 582, 584 (1978).
  • Glick v. Town of Ossipee 547 A.2d 231 N.H. 1988
    .” RSA 674:36, 11(a) (formerly RSA 36:21 (Supp. 1975)); see Garipay v. Hanover, 116 N.H. 34, 35, 351 A.2d 64, 65 (1976); Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 620, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978).
  • Rancourt v. Town of Barnstead 523 A.2d 55 N.H. 1986
    Next, we turn to the plaintiff’s argument that the three percent annual growth rate adopted in the master plan did not have a “solid scientific, statistical basis.” Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978).
  • Stoney-Brook Development Corp. v. Town of Fremont 474 A.2d 561 N.H. 1984
    Although a town need not hire an independent consultant, “[c]omprehensive planning with a solid scientific, statistical basis is the key element in land use regulation in New Hampshire.” Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978); see also RSA 674:2, IX (Supp. 1983).
  • Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp. 433 A.2d 1291 N.H. 1981
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 586 (1978).
  • J.E.D. Associates, Inc. v. Town of Atkinson 432 A.2d 12 N.H. 1981
    The defendant’s reliance on Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 392 A.2d 582 (1978), is misplaced.
  • Cesere v. Town of Windham 430 A.2d 1134 N.H. 1981
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978).
  • Durant v. Town of Dunbarton 430 A.2d 140 N.H. 1981
    Under its subdivision regulations a planjomgJaaaxd-may consider any characteristics of the landJdratNelate to “the current and future fitness of the land for building purposes.” Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 621, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978); see Town of Seabrook v. Tra-Sea Corp., 119 N.H. at 941, 410 A.2d at 243.
  • Price v. Planning Board 417 A.2d 997 N.H. 1980
    necessary.” See Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 392 A.2d 582 (1978).
  • Conway v. Town of Stratham 414 A.2d 539 N.H. 1980
    RSA 31:62 requires towns to regulate growth “in accordance with a comprehensive plan.” Id.; see Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 392 A.2d 582 (1978).
  • In Re Estate of Sayewich 413 A.2d 581 N.H. 1980
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 620, 392 A.2d 582, 585 (1978); see RSA 36:19-29.
  • Town of Seabrook v. Tra-Sea Corp. 410 A.2d 240 N.H. 1979
    Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 392 A.2d 582 (1978).
  • Beck v. Town of Raymond 394 A.2d 847 N.H. 1978
    “Comprehensive planning with a solid scientific, statistical basis is the key element in land use regulation in New Hampshire.” Patenaude v. Town of Meredith, 118 N.H. 616, 392 A.2d 582 (1978).