DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 388 A.2d 940.

17 citing documents.

  • Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty Trust 692 A.2d 514 N.H. 1997
    Similarly, the trial court could appropriately find that Salem Farm had not met its burden of establishing the basic elements of estoppel, cf. Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442-43, 388 A.2d 940, 942-43 (1978), as the court had already determined that the plaintiff had acted reasonably during the time period in question, suggesting that the plaintiff did not intend to mislead or induce reliance by Salem Farm.
  • Hawthorne Trust v. Maine Savings Bank 618 A.2d 828 N.H. 1992
    a concealment of material facts; (2) the representation must have been made with knowledge of the facts; (3) the party to whom it was made must have been ignorant of the truth of the matter; (4) it must have been made with the intention that the other party should act upon it; and (5) the other party must have been induced to act upon it to [its] prejudice.” Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • Turco v. Town of Barnstead 615 A.2d 1237 N.H. 1992
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of Claremont 608 A.2d 840 N.H. 1992
    The City’s concern that the estoppel claim was used offensively by GLAC as a basis for establishing liability, in conflict with *292 our decision in Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 388 A.2d 940 (1978), is likewise unfounded.
  • Shakra v. Benedictine Sisters of Bedford 553 A.2d 1327 N.H. 1989
    a concealment of material facts; (2) the representation must have been made with knowledge of the facts; (3) the party to whom it was made must have been ignorant of the truth of the matter; (4) it must have been made with the intention that the other party should act upon it; and (5) the other party must have been induced to act upon it to his prejudice.’ ” Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942-43 (1978) (quoting Monadnock School Dist.
  • Hodge v. Allstate Insurance 546 A.2d 1078 N.H. 1988
    r a concealment of material facts; (2) the representation must have been made with knowledge of the facts; (3) the party to whom it was made must have been ignorant of the truth of the matter; (4) it must have been made with the intention that the other party should act upon it; and (5) the other party must have been induced to act upon it to his prejudice.” Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978) (quoting Monadnock School District v. Fitzwilliam, 105 N
  • McGovern v. City of Manchester 546 A.2d 1057 N.H. 1988
    Soares v. Town of Atkinson, 129 N.H. 313, 529 A.2d 867 (1987); Soares v. Town of Atkinson, 128 N.H. 350, 512 A.2d 436 (1986); Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 388 A.2d 940 (1978); see also Hatcher v. Planning *632 Board of Village, 490 N.Y.S.2d 559 (1985) (hearing needed to resolve claim of bad faith).
  • Goodwin Railroad v. State 517 A.2d 823 N.H. 1986
    Olszak supra; Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • City of Concord v. Tompkins 471 A.2d 1152 N.H. 1984
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • Guri v. Guri 448 A.2d 370 N.H. 1982
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • Lineham v. Southern New England Production Credit Ass'n 442 A.2d 585 N.H. 1982
    Bank v. Lavallee, 96 N.H. 353, 355, 77 A.2d 107, 108 (1950) (citations omitted); see Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 444, 388 A.2d 940, 943 (1978).
  • Concrete Constructors, Inc. v. Harry Shapiro & Sons, Inc. 436 A.2d 77 N.H. 1981
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978) (quoting Monadnock Regional School Dist.
  • Appeal of Cloutier Lumber Co. 431 A.2d 112 N.H. 1981
    Co., 119 N.H. 686, 690, 406 A.2d 711, 714 (1979); Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • Town of Durham v. Cutter 428 A.2d 904 N.H. 1981
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc, 118 N.H. 438, 444, 388 A.2d 940, 943 (1978).
  • In Re Irene W. 427 A.2d 24 N.H. 1981
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 444, 388 A.2d 940, 943 (1978); RSA 170-C:12; Restatement of Judgments § 69, Comment e (1942).
  • Town of Nottingham v. Harvey 424 A.2d 1125 N.H. 1980
    Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 444, 388 A.2d 940, 944 (1978).
  • Olszak v. Peerless Insurance 406 A.2d 711 N.H. 1979
    Monadnock School District v. Town of Fitzwilliam, 105 N.H. 487,488-89, 203 A.2d 46, 48 (1964) (citation omitted); see Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc., 118 N.H. 438, 442, 388 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).