Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Gregoire, 384 A.2d 132.

14 citing documents.

  • In re Sanborn 545 A.2d 726 N.H. 1988
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 143, 384 A.2d 132, 133 (1978); Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 827-28, 367 A.2d 1041, 1043 (1976).
  • State v. Robb 484 A.2d 1130 N.H. 1984
    In State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 144, 384 A.2d 132, 134 (1978), we held that part I, article 15 of our State Constitution required that such a finding be supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Ballou 481 A.2d 260 N.H. 1984
    satisfied by a preponderance of the evidence that the hospital patient suffers from mental disease and that it would be dangerous for him to go at large, the court shall renew the order of committal or transfer.” Part of this statute had been found unconstitutional because it permitted recommittal based on a mere preponderance of the evidence, rather than based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • In re Scott L. 469 A.2d 1336 N.H. 1983
    While this court has recognized the fallibility of psychiatric opinions on the issue of whether a person meets the criteria for involuntary admission, see Proctor v. Butler, 117 N.H. at 934, 380 A.2d at 677; State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 143, 384 A.2d 132, 133 (1978), we have already provided substantial safeguards against excessive deference to those opinions.
  • Opinion of the Justices 465 A.2d 484 N.H. 1983
    I, art. 15; see In re Gamble, 118 N.H 771, 775, 394 A.2d 308, 309-10 (1978); State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H 140, 142-44, 384 A.2d 132, 133 (1978).
  • State v. Paradis 455 A.2d 1070 N.H. 1983
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 144, 384 A.2d 132, 134 (1978) (the court found that a statutory amendment reducing the burden of proof for recommittal to the preponderance of the evidence was unconstitutional).
  • Opinion of the Justices 442 A.2d 594 N.H. 1982
    In State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978), we considered the burden of proof in criminal insanity recommitment proceedings brought under RSA 651:ll-a (as amended by Laws 1977, 180:1).
  • State v. Novosel 412 A.2d 739 N.H. 1980
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978); Novosel v. Helgemoe, 118 N.H. 115, 384 A.2d 124 (1978); State v. Novosel, 115 N.H. 302, 339 A.2d 16 (1975).
  • Grindle v. Miller 400 A.2d 787 N.H. 1979
    Because a finite sentence will be served by a convicted DSO, the two-year hearings mandated by Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976) and State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978), are not required.
  • Hudson v. Miller 399 A.2d 612 N.H. 1979
    His petition, therefore, deserves the same close look we gave the commitment proceedings involved in State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978); Novosel v. Helgemoe, 118 N.H. 115, 384 A.2d 124 (1978); Proctor v. Butler, 117 N.H. 927, 380 A.2d 673 (1977); and Gibbs v. Helgemoe supra.
  • In Re Gamble 394 A.2d 308 N.H. 1978
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978); Novosel v. Helgemoe, 118 N.H. 115, 384 A.2d 124 (1978).
  • State v. Radford 393 A.2d 561 N.H. 1978
    Novosel v. Helgemoe, 118 N.H. 115, 384 A.2d 124 (1978); State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978); Comment, 11 Harv.
  • State v. ROBERT H. ____ 393 A.2d 1387 N.H. 1978
    Involuntary commitment proceedings, “whether civil or criminal,” involve a deprivation of liberty “which constitutes a grievous loss.” Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 828, 367 A.2d 1041, 1043 (1976), and State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978).
  • Novosel v. Helgemoe 384 A.2d 124 N.H. 1978
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978), decided this day; Proctor v. Butler, 117 N.H. 927, 380 A.2d 673 (1977); see Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976).