DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Hogg, 385 A.2d 844.

20 citing documents.

  • In re Toyota Avalon 927 A.2d 1239 N.H. 2007
    State v. McNally, 122 N.H. 892, 895 (1982); State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 266 (1978).
  • State v. McLellan 817 A.2d 309 N.H. 2003
    While we recognize that we have found New Hampshire’s Double Jeopardy Clause to provide greater protection than its federal counterpart in certain circumstances, see, e.g., State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 266-67 (1978), we are not persuaded that we should interpret the State Constitution differently than the Federal Constitution in this context.
  • State v. Laurie 653 A.2d 549 N.H. 1995
    at 231-32, 471 A.2d at 350; see, e.g., State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 385 A.2d 844 (1978) (interpreting the State Constitution to afford greater protection than Federal Constitution against double jeopardy).
  • State v. Montella 610 A.2d 351 N.H. 1992
    State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 232, 471 A.2d 347, 351 (1983); State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264, 385 A.2d 844, 845 (1978).
  • In re Estate of Norton 599 A.2d 138 N.H. 1991
    [they] were not necessary to the decisions, they may be said to be truly dicta,” Coleman v. Coleman, 94 N.H. at 458, 55 A.2d at 473; see also State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 267, 385 A.2d 844, 847 (1978), and not deserving of the deference accorded by stare decisis to actual holdings, cf. Brannigan v. Usitalo, 134 N.H. 50, 53, 587 A.2d 1232, 1233 (1991).
  • Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
  • Hopps v. Utica Mutual Insurance 506 A.2d 294 N.H. 1985
    Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 442-45 (1970); State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264-67, 385 A.2d 844, 845-47 (1978); cf. State v. Fielders, 124 N.H. 310, 313-14, 470 A.2d 897, 898-900 (1983).
  • State v. Sidebotham 474 A.2d 1377 N.H. 1984
    This court has consistently recognized that in a given situation “[o]ur [State] constitution often will afford greater protection against the action of the State than does the Federal constitution.” State v. Settle, 122 N.H. 214, 217, 447 A.2d 1284, 1285 (1982); see, e.g., State v. Osborne, 119 N.H. 427, 433, 402 A.2d 493, 497 (1979); State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264, 385 A.2d 844, 845 (1978).
  • State v. Fielders 470 A.2d 897 N.H. 1983
    Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 445 (1970); Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 794 (1969); State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264-66, 385 A.2d 844, 846-47 (1978).
  • State v. Ball 471 A.2d 347 N.H. 1983
    State v. Settle, 122 N.H. 214, 217, 447 A.2d 1284, 1285 (1982); State v. Osborne, 119 N.H. 427, 433, 402 A.2d 493, 497 (1979); State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264, 385 A.2d 844, 845 (1978).
  • State v. Sands 467 A.2d 202 N.H. 1983
    State v. Whittemore, 50 N.H. 245, 248 (1870), overruled on other grounds, State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 267, 385 *602 A.2d 844, 847 (1978); see State v. Langley, 34 N.H. 529, 533 (1857).
  • State v. McNally 451 A.2d 1305 N.H. 1982
    State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 266, 385 A.2d 844, 846 (1978); N.H. Const. pt.
  • State v. Settle 447 A.2d 1284 N.H. 1982
    1, art. 16, is greater than that provided by the Federal constitution, compare State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 263-67, 385 A.2d 844, 845-47 (1978) with Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, 136 (1959), and that, contrary to the federal practice, the reasonable doubt standard must be used by the trial judge when ruling on the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession.
  • State v. Hastings 430 A.2d 1131 N.H. 1981
    Harris v. Washington, 404 U.S. 55, 56 (1971) (per curiam); State v. Proulx, 110 N.H. 187, 189, 263 A.2d 673, 675 (1970); see State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 266, 385 A.2d 844, 846-47 (1978).
  • Carson v. Maurer 424 A.2d 825 N.H. 1980
    Opinion of the Justices, 118 N.H. 347, 349-50, 387 A.2d 333, 335 (1978); Angwin v. Manchester, 118 N.H. 336, 337, 386 A.2d 1272, 1273 (1978); see State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264, 385 A.2d 844, 845 (1978); State v. Phinney, 117 N.H. 145, 146, 370 A.2d 1153, 1153 (1977).
  • State v. Brady 424 A.2d 407 N.H. 1980
    Although United States Supreme Court decisions coftstruing the federal constitution are not necessarily binding on this court in construing the State constitution, State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 264, 385 A.2d 844, 845 (1978), in the situation before us the constitutional analysis is similar.
  • State v. Heinz 407 A.2d 814 N.H. 1979
    Where the two offenses are identical except for jurisdictional facts, a majority of this court indicated that under our State constitution “[i]t is pure fiction to say they are different crimes [solely] because of dual sovereignty.” State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 266, 385 A.2d 844, 846 (1978).
  • State v. Osborne 402 A.2d 493 N.H. 1979
    See, e.g., State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 263, 385 A.2d 844 (1978); State v. Phinney, 117 N.H. 145, 370 A.2d 1153 (1977).
  • Opinion of the Justices 387 A.2d 333 N.H. 1978
    State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 385 A.2d 844 (1978); Angwin v. Manchester, 118 N.H. 336, 386 A.2d 1272 (1978).
  • Angwin v. City of Manchester 386 A.2d 1272 N.H. 1978
    State v. Hogg, 118 N.H. 262, 385 A.2d 844 (1978); see State v. Leclair, 118 N.H. 214, 385 A.2d 831 (1978).