Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 424 A.2d 1125.

19 citing documents.

City of Rochester v. Corpening 907 A.2d 383 N.H. 2006
The general rule of statutory construction is that “the word ‘may5 makes enforcement of a statute permissive and that the word ‘shall’ requires mandatory enforcement.” Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895 (1980).
In re Bazemore 899 A.2d 225 N.H. 2006
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895 (1980); see also Appeal of Rowan, 142 N.H. 67, 71 (1997).
Morgenstern v. Town of Rye 794 A.2d 782 N.H. 2002
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892 (1980).
In re Mone 719 A.2d 626 N.H. 1998
It is well-settled that the term “shall” in a statute “requires mandatory enforcement.” Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895, 424 A.2d 1125, 1129 (1980).
Appeal of HCA Parkland Medical Center 719 A.2d 619 N.H. 1998
RSA 281-A:5 (Supp. 1992) (amended 1994),:5-a,:6 (Supp. 1997); cf. Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895, 424 A.2d 1125, 1129 (1980) (the term “shall” requires mandatory compliance).
Town of Swanzey v. Liebeler 674 A.2d 968 N.H. 1996
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895, 424 A.2d 1125, 1129 (1980).
Appeal of Town of Newmarket 665 A.2d 1088 N.H. 1995
See, e.g., Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 898, 424 A.2d 1125, 1131 (1980).
Delude v. Town of Amherst 628 A.2d 251 N.H. 1993
In remanding, we note that the plaintiffs carry the burden of proving the invalidity of the town’s zoning ordinance; “[w]hen a municipal ordinance is challenged, there is a presumption that the ordinance is valid and, consequently, not lightly to be overturned.” Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980).
Buskey v. Town of Hanover 577 A.2d 406 N.H. 1990
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980); Carbonneau v. Town of Exeter, 119 N.H. 259, 264, 401 A.2d 675, 678 (1979).
Town of North Hampton v. Sanderson 557 A.2d 643 N.H. 1989
Alexander v. Town of Hampstead, 129 N.H. 278, 281, 525 A.2d 276, 278 (1987); Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980).
Barton v. H.D. Riders Motorcycle Club, Inc. 550 A.2d 91 N.H. 1988
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980).
Alexander v. Town of Hampstead 525 A.2d 276 N.H. 1987
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980).
Town of Windham v. Alfond 523 A.2d 42 N.H. 1986
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980).
Stoney-Brook Development Corp. v. Town of Fremont 474 A.2d 561 N.H. 1984
*588 Although municipal ordinances carry with them a presumption of validity, Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980); Rochester v. Barcomb, 103 N.H. 247, 253, 169 A.2d 281, 285 (1961), we believe the record supports the master’s finding that Stoney-Brook sustained its burden of showing that Article IV-A of the Fremont Zoning Ordinance is illegal and unenforceable.
In re Robyn W. 469 A.2d 1351 N.H. 1983
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H 889, 895, 424 A.2d 1125, 1129 (1980); In re Russell C., 120 N.H. 260, 264, 414 A.2d 934, 936 (1980).
In re Gary B. 466 A.2d 929 N.H. 1983
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 898, 424 A.2d 1125, 1131 (1980); Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 1 N.H. 111, 129 (1817), rev’d on other grounds, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.)
Appeal of Peirce 451 A.2d 363 N.H. 1982
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895, 424 A.2d 1125, 1129 (1980).
Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp. 433 A.2d 1291 N.H. 1981
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 895-96, 424 A.2d 1125, 1129 (1980); Silva v. Botsch, 120 N.H. 600, 601, 420 A.2d 301, 302 (1980).
Town of Durham v. Cutter 428 A.2d 904 N.H. 1981
Town of Nottingham v. Harvey, 120 N.H. 889, 892, 424 A.2d 1125, 1127 (1980); Rochester v. Barcomb, 103 N.H. 247, 253, 169 A.2d 281, 285 (1961).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by