DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Houle, 412 A.2d 736.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Porelle 822 A.2d 562 N.H. 2003
    Although the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to reconsider and vacate may have been within its sound discretion, see State v. Winn, 141 N.H. 812, 814 (1997); State v. Houle, 120 N.H. 160, 161 (1980), we will address the merits of his constitutional claim in the interest of judicial economy.
  • State v. Turgeon 630 A.2d 276 N.H. 1993
    The determination of whether to set aside the verdict lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, a decision we will reverse only if we find an abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Blow 608 A.2d 1309 N.H. 1992
    State v. Thaxton, 120 N.H. 526, 529, 419 A.2d 392, 393 (1980); State v. Houle, 120 N.H. 160, 161, 412 A.2d 736, 737 (1980); see also State v. McCue, 134 N.H. 94, 104-05, 589 A.2d 580, 586-87 (1991).
  • State v. O'Neill 589 A.2d 999 N.H. 1991
    The defendant contends that, for the review of a granting of judgment n.o.v., we should apply the standard of review for setting aside a verdict, as set out in State v. Houle, 120 N.H. 160, 412 A.2d 736 (1980) and State v. Gruber, 132 N.H. 83, 562 A.2d 156 (1989), that “the determination whether to deny a motion to set aside the verdict rests within the sound discretion of the court.” Id.
  • State v. Gruber 562 A.2d 156 N.H. 1989
    We have previously noted that the determination whether to deny a motion to set aside the verdict rests within the sound discretion of the court.
  • State v. Lovely 480 A.2d 847 N.H. 1984
    Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict.
  • Lawlor v. Lawlor 459 A.2d 238 N.H. 1983
    Goudreault v. Goudreault, 120 N.H. 140, 140, 412 A.2d 736, 736 (1980); see Perron v. Perron, 122 N.H. 855, 856, 451 A.2d 1282, 1283 (1982); Murano v. Murano, 122 N.H. at 227, 442 A.2d at 599.
  • Parker v. Parker 448 A.2d 414 N.H. 1982
    Hanson v. Hanson, 121 N.H. 719, 720, 433 A.2d 1310, 1311 (1980); Goudreault v. Goudreault, 120 N.H. 140, 140, 412 A.2d 736, 736 (1981).
  • MacDonald v. MacDonald 443 A.2d 1017 N.H. 1982
    discretion.” The master’s discretion “in this area is broad and we will not substitute our judgment for that of the master or trial court.” Buckner v. Buckner, 120 N.H. 402, 404, 415 A.2d 871, 873 (1980); see Goudreault v. Goudreault, 120 N.H. 140, 140, 412 A.2d 736, 736 (1980).
  • Heinze v. Heinze 444 A.2d 559 N.H. 1982
    Henderson v. Henderson, 121 N.H. 807, 809, 435 A.2d 133, 135 (1981); Goudreault v. Goudreault, 120 N.H. 140, 140, 412 A.2d 736, 736 (1980).
  • Henderson v. Henderson 435 A.2d 133 N.H. 1981
    Goudreault v. Goudreault, 120 N.H. 140, 140, 412 A.2d 736, 736 (1980); Grandmaison v. Grandmaison, 119 N.H. 268, 270, 401 A.2d 1058 -59 (1979); Hunneyman v. Hunneyman, 118 N.H. 652, 652-53, 392 A.2d 147, 148 (1978); Azzi v. Azzi, 118 N.H. 653, 655, 392 A.2d 148, 149 (1978).
  • Hanson v. Hanson 433 A.2d 1310 N.H. 1981
    Goudreault v. Goudreault, 120 N.H. 140, 140, 412 A.2d 736, 736 (1980); Starkeson v. Starkeson, 119 N.H. 78, 80-81, 397 A.2d 1043, 1045 (1979).
  • State v. Thaxton 419 A.2d 392 N.H. 1980
    Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979); see State v. Houle, 120 N.H. 160, 412 A.2d 736 (1980).