Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 415 A.2d 671.
-
Todd Harbour & a. v. Henry Farrin, Jr. & a.
N.H. 2019
Consent “may be manifested by action or inaction and need not be communicated to the actor.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 892(1), at 362; cf. 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 349 (1980) (stating agency relationship may be implied from parties’ conduct or other evidence of intent).
-
State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.
168 N.H. 211
N.H. 2015
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350 (1980).
-
Carrier v. McLlarky
693 A.2d 76
N.H. 1997
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 348-49, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980).
-
Proctor v. Macdonald
689 A.2d 1330
N.H. 1997
*624 When parties to an agency relationship have not agreed upon the amount of commission, “the agent is entitled to the reasonable worth of his services.” 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 349, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Banker v. Pauson
647 A.2d 146
N.H. 1994
Fischer v. Patterson, 97 N.H. 318, 320-21, 86 A.2d 851, 852 (1952); see 93 Clearing House v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 348, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980).
-
Fleet Bank v. Chain Construction Corp.
635 A.2d 1348
N.H. 1993
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 348-49, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980).
-
Appeal of Lambrou
609 A.2d 754
N.H. 1992
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Finlay v. Frederick
606 A.2d 1375
N.H. 1992
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 349, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980).
-
Renovest Co. v. Hodges Development Corp.
600 A.2d 448
N.H. 1991
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
In re Estate of Buttrick
597 A.2d 74
N.H. 1991
In reviewing this record, we are guided by the rule that “[t]he trier of fact is in the best position to measure the persuasiveness and credibility of evidence and is not compelled to believe even uncontroverted evidence.” Restaurant Operators, Inc. v. Jenney, 128 N.H. 708, 711, 519 A.2d 256, 259 (1986) (citing 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980)).
-
Patterson v. Tirollo
581 A.2d 74
N.H. 1990
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 349, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980); Mannone v. Whaland, 118 N.H. at 88, 382 A.2d at 920.
-
Johnston v. Lynch
574 A.2d 934
N.H. 1990
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Finlay Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. Paino
573 A.2d 125
N.H. 1990
This is a view which was recognized by this court in 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 348-49, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980): “An agency relationship exists only when the seller gives the agent some manifestation that the agent may act on his behalf and the agent consents to do so.
-
Brent v. Paquette
567 A.2d 976
N.H. 1989
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. v. O'Sullivan
531 A.2d 714
N.H. 1987
“The trier of fact is in the best position to measure the persuasiveness of evidence and the credibility of witnesses.” 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
ERA Pat Demarais Associates, Inc. v. Alexander Eastman Foundation
523 A.2d 74
N.H. 1986
According to the common law, 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 348-49, 415 A.2d 671, 673 (1980), the principal’s manifestation or consent to an agent need not to be written.
-
Morrill v. Tilney
519 A.2d 293
N.H. 1986
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Restaurant Operators, Inc. v. Jenney
519 A.2d 256
N.H. 1986
93 Clearing Home, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980) (citing Cragin v. Woollett, 104 N.H. 202, 206, 182 A.2d 457, 460 (1962)).
-
Fisher v. Koper
499 A.2d 1001
N.H. 1985
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Phelan v. L. M. & L. Corp.
461 A.2d 105
N.H. 1983
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 351-52, 415 A.2d 671, 675 (1980); Wein v. Arlen’s, 98 N.H. 487, 488-89, 103 A.2d 86, 88 (1954).
-
Parker v. Parker
448 A.2d 414
N.H. 1982
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980); Ballou v. Ballou, 118 N.H. at 466, 387 A.2d at 1170.
-
Gleason v. Elbthal Realty Trust
445 A.2d 1104
N.H. 1982
or other conveyance of said trust property, or any part thereof.” Because the trier of fact is in the best position to evaluate the evidence, measure its persuasiveness and appraise the credibility of witnesses, 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980), and because the master’s finding is supported by the evidence, we will not overturn the trial court’s decision.
-
Roy v. Perrin
441 A.2d 1151
N.H. 1982
State v. Hardy, 120 N.H. at 554, 419 A.2d at 400; see 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 679 (1980).
-
Gosselin v. Archibald
437 A.2d 302
N.H. 1981
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350-51, 415 A.2d 671, 675 (1980); Bellak v. Franconia College, 118 N.H. 313, 316, 386 A.2d 1266, 1268 (1978).
-
Bradley v. Patterson
435 A.2d 129
N.H. 1981
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980).
-
Hangar One, Inc. v. Davis Associates, Inc.
431 A.2d 792
N.H. 1981
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 349, 415 A.2d 671, 673-74 (1980); Belleau v. Hopewell supra; Kopka Real Estate, Inc. v. MacLeod, 119 N.H. 547, 549, 404 A.2d 298, 299 (1979).
-
M. W. Goodell Construction Co. v. Monadnock Skating Club, Inc.
429 A.2d 329
N.H. 1981
93 Clearing House, Inc. v. Khoury, 120 N.H. 346, 350, 415 A.2d 671, 674 (1980); Dana A. Wein & Sons v. Keller, 118 N.H. 545, 547, 391 A.2d 878, 880 (1978).