DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 411 A.2d 144.

18 citing documents.

  • Christopher Andrews & a. v. Kearsarge Lighting Precinct N.H. 2023
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 10 (1980) (“If the ‘administrative gloss’ placed upon the clause over a period of years is to be changed, the voters of [the town], not the zoning board, must change it.”).
  • Frost v. COM'R, NEW HAMPSHIRE BANKING DEPT. 42 A.3d 738 N.H. 2012
    Co., 156 N.H. 429, 434, 938 A.2d 905 (2007); cf. Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9-10, 411 A.2d 144 (1980).
  • Grand China, Inc. v. United National Insurance 938 A.2d 905 N.H. 2007
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9-10 (1980).
  • Hanselv. City of Keene 634 A.2d 1351 N.H. 1993
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9-10, 411 A.2d 144, 146-47 (1980); see also Tessier, Ex’r v. Town of Hudson, 135 N.H 168, 170-71, 599 A.2d 1244, 1246 (1991); P. Loughlin, 15 New Hampshire Practice, Land Use Planning and Zoning § 6.02, at 84-85 (2d ed. 1993).
  • City of Dover v. Kimball 616 A.2d 516 N.H. 1992
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6,11, 411 A.2d 144, 147 (1980).
  • Tessier v. Town of Hudson 599 A.2d 1244 N.H. 1991
    Upon finding that the town had a de facto policy of issuing permits to non-conforming lots, the court ruled that such policy could only be changed by the voters of the town, citing our opinion in Win-Tasch Corporation v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 411 A.2d 144 (1980).
  • Britton v. Town of Chester 595 A.2d 492 N.H. 1991
    (quoting Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9, 411 A.2d 144, 146 (1980)).
  • Lake Sunapee Protective Ass'n v. New Hampshire Wetlands Board 574 A.2d 1368 N.H. 1990
    “The test on appeal is not whether we would have found as the master did, but whether there was evidence on which he could reasonably base his finding.” Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9, 411 A.2d 144, 146 (1980); see Rowe v. Town of North Hampton, 131 N.H. 424, 428, 553 A.2d 1331, 1334 (1989); Durant v. Town of Dunbarton, 121 N.H. at 357, 430 A.2d at 144.
  • Cannata v. Town of Deerfield 566 A.2d 162 N.H. 1989
    The Trial Court (Gray, J.), citing Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 411 A.2d 144 (1980) and Sibson v. State, 111 N.H. 305, 282 A.2d 664 (1971), dismissed both counts on the ground that the actions of the selectmen, and therefore the town, were protected by the doctrine of quasi-judicial immunity.
  • Biggs v. Town of Sandwich 470 A.2d 928 N.H. 1984
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9, 411 A.2d 144, 146 (1980).
  • Appeal of Global Moving & Storage of New Hampshire, Inc. 451 A.2d 167 N.H. 1982
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9-10, 411 A.2d 144, 146 (1980) (citing New Hampshire Retail Grocers Ass’n v. State Tax Comm’n, 113 N.H. 511, 514, 309 A.2d 890, 892 (1972)); see also Wyatt v. State Board of Equalization, 74 N.H. 552, 569, 70 A. 387, 396 (1908); see generally Ford Motor Co. v. F.T.C., 673 F.2d 1008, 1009-10 (1981).
  • Brennan v. Winnipesaukee Flagship Corp. 446 A.2d 1175 N.H. 1982
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 10, 411 A.2d 144, 147 (1980); Trottier v. City of Lebanon, 117 N.H. 148, 150, 370 A.2d 275, 276-77 (1977); RSA 31:78.
  • Durant v. Town of Dunbarton 430 A.2d 140 N.H. 1981
    Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 9, 411 A.2d 144, 146 (1980).
  • Slater v. Planning Board of Town of Rumney 427 A.2d 511 N.H. 1981
    Harkeem v. Adams, 117 N.H. 687, 691, 377 A.2d 617, 619 (1977); cf. Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 11, 411 A.2d 144, 147 (1980).
  • Shaw v. City of Manchester 419 A.2d 394 N.H. 1980
    See, e.g., Win-Tasch Corporation v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 411 A.2d 144 (1980); Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Bd., 117 N.H. 622, 376 A.2d 885 (1977).
  • Marino v. Goss 418 A.2d 1271 N.H. 1980
    Win-Tasch Corporation v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 11, 411 A.2d 144, 147 (1980); RSA 31:104 (Supp. 1979).
  • Merchants National Bank of Manchester v. Town of Exeter 412 A.2d 1016 N.H. 1980
    *160 “The test on appeal is not whether we would have found as the master [court] did, but whether there was evidence on which he could reasonably base his finding.” Win-Tasch Corporation v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 411 A.2d 144 (1980).
  • Carbonneau v. Town of Rye 411 A.2d 1110 N.H. 1980
    RSA 31:82; 31:85; Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of Merrimack, 120 N.H. 6, 411 A.2d 144 (1980); Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Bd., 117 N.H. 622, 625, 376 A.2d 885, 886 (1977); Conery v. Nashua, 103 N.H. 16, 21, 164 A.2d 247, 250 (1960).