Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning Board, 408 A.2d 113.
-
Joseph Kelly & a. v. Pine Trail Cottages Condominium Association & a.
N.H. 2021
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751 (1979) (explaining that nominal damages “are recoverable whenever there has been a breach of a legal duty or invasion of a legal right and no actual damage resulted or was proved”); see also King v. Brock, 646 S.E.2d 206, 207 (Ga.
-
Frank Farris v. Monty Woods
N.H. 2019
“[B]efore a Harkeem exception may be carved out, it must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752 (1979).
-
Seacoast Helicopters, LLC v. Kevin Beaulieu
N.H. 2019
“[B]efore a Harkeem exception may be carved out, it must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752 (1979).
-
In re Mallett
37 A.3d 333
N.H. 2012
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752 (1979) (“[B]efore a Harkeem exception to the general rule may be carved out, it must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.”).
-
Smith v. Shepard
740 A.2d 1039
N.H. 1999
Such an award “must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton, or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 119 (1979).
-
State v. Tallman
652 A.2d 134
N.H. 1994
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 750, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979).
-
Simpson v. Calivas
650 A.2d 318
N.H. 1994
We need not determine whether a directed verdict is proper where there is no evidence on damages, cf. Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979), because we hold that the trial court erred in excluding the appraisal values in the probate inventory.
-
Flanagan v. Prudhomme
644 A.2d 51
N.H. 1994
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979) (holding that nominal damages that were not compensatory should be awarded only in the smallest appreciable amount).
-
Fitz v. Coutinho
622 A.2d 1220
N.H. 1993
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979).
-
Maguire v. Merrimack Mutual Insurance
573 A.2d 451
N.H. 1990
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979).
-
Seward v. Loranger
547 A.2d 207
N.H. 1988
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749-50, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979).
-
Howard v. Howard
531 A.2d 331
N.H. 1987
The trial judge in such a case need not respond expressly to every specific request filed by a party, but the court is obligated to make findings of the “basic,” see Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979), or “essential” facts, see Heinze v. Heinze, 122 N.H. 358, 362, 444 A.2d 559, 562 (1982), that are sufficient to support the ultimate decision.
-
Leavitt v. Hamelin
495 A.2d 1286
N.H. 1985
Silva v. Botsch, 121 N.H. 1041, 1043, 437 A.2d 313, 314 (1981); Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979); Morse v. Ford, 118 N.H. 280, 281, 385 A.2d 229, 230 (1978); Harkeem v. Adams, 117 N.H. 687, 690, 377 A.2d 617, 619 (1977).
-
Smith v. State
486 A.2d 289
N.H. 1984
Hangar One, Inc. v. Davis Associates, Inc., 121 N.H. 586, 431 A.2d 792 (1981); Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 408 A.2d 113 (1979).
-
Howard v. Howard
469 A.2d 1318
N.H. 1983
In Society for Protection of N.H. Forests v. Site Evaluation Comm., 115 N.H. 163, 173, 337 A.2d 778, 786 (1975), we stated that “[w]hile this court has repeatedly recognized the need for basic findings supported by the record, it has not mandated detailed and specific reasons for the basic findings.” See also Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979).
-
Town of Milford v. Johnson
451 A.2d 1295
N.H. 1982
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 119 (1979).
-
Bouthiette v. Wiggin
451 A.2d 368
N.H. 1982
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979); see Suojanen v. Tardif, 121 N.H. 1036, 1040, 437 A.2d 310, 312 (1981).
-
Heinze v. Heinze
444 A.2d 559
N.H. 1982
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979); R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976).
-
Silva v. Botsch
437 A.2d 313
N.H. 1981
Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979); Morse v. Ford, 118 N.H. 280, 281, 385 A.2d 229, 230 (1978).
-
MacKay v. Breault
427 A.2d 1099
N.H. 1981
Because there is substantial evidence supporting the decision of the master, Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749-50, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979), the judgment is Affirmed.
-
American Home Assurance Co. v. Star Speedway, Inc.
409 A.2d 1343
N.H. 1979
The exceptions of American Home Assurance Company were transferred to this court by Goode, J., and give rise to the sole question before us. Whether or not American’s arguments were strained, the court did not specifically find bad faith or “obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning Board, 119 N.H. 743, 408 A.2d 113 (1979).
-
Austin v. Ellis
408 A.2d 784
N.H. 1979
Pugliese v. Steele, 119 N.H. 743, 408 A.2d 113 (1979); Seely v. Hand, 119 N.H. 303, 307, 402 A.2d 162, 166 (1979); Starvishv.