Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning Board, 408 A.2d 113.

22 citing documents.

  • Joseph Kelly & a. v. Pine Trail Cottages Condominium Association & a. N.H. 2021
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751 (1979) (explaining that nominal damages “are recoverable whenever there has been a breach of a legal duty or invasion of a legal right and no actual damage resulted or was proved”); see also King v. Brock, 646 S.E.2d 206, 207 (Ga.
  • Frank Farris v. Monty Woods N.H. 2019
    “[B]efore a Harkeem exception may be carved out, it must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752 (1979).
  • Seacoast Helicopters, LLC v. Kevin Beaulieu N.H. 2019
    “[B]efore a Harkeem exception may be carved out, it must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752 (1979).
  • In re Mallett 37 A.3d 333 N.H. 2012
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752 (1979) (“[B]efore a Harkeem exception to the general rule may be carved out, it must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.”).
  • Smith v. Shepard 740 A.2d 1039 N.H. 1999
    Such an award “must be supported by a specific finding of bad faith, such as obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton, or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 119 (1979).
  • State v. Tallman 652 A.2d 134 N.H. 1994
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 750, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979).
  • Simpson v. Calivas 650 A.2d 318 N.H. 1994
    We need not determine whether a directed verdict is proper where there is no evidence on damages, cf. Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979), because we hold that the trial court erred in excluding the appraisal values in the probate inventory.
  • Flanagan v. Prudhomme 644 A.2d 51 N.H. 1994
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979) (holding that nominal damages that were not compensatory should be awarded only in the smallest appreciable amount).
  • Fitz v. Coutinho 622 A.2d 1220 N.H. 1993
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979).
  • Maguire v. Merrimack Mutual Insurance 573 A.2d 451 N.H. 1990
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979).
  • Seward v. Loranger 547 A.2d 207 N.H. 1988
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749-50, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979).
  • Howard v. Howard 531 A.2d 331 N.H. 1987
    The trial judge in such a case need not respond expressly to every specific request filed by a party, but the court is obligated to make findings of the “basic,” see Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979), or “essential” facts, see Heinze v. Heinze, 122 N.H. 358, 362, 444 A.2d 559, 562 (1982), that are sufficient to support the ultimate decision.
  • Leavitt v. Hamelin 495 A.2d 1286 N.H. 1985
    Silva v. Botsch, 121 N.H. 1041, 1043, 437 A.2d 313, 314 (1981); Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979); Morse v. Ford, 118 N.H. 280, 281, 385 A.2d 229, 230 (1978); Harkeem v. Adams, 117 N.H. 687, 690, 377 A.2d 617, 619 (1977).
  • Smith v. State 486 A.2d 289 N.H. 1984
    Hangar One, Inc. v. Davis Associates, Inc., 121 N.H. 586, 431 A.2d 792 (1981); Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 408 A.2d 113 (1979).
  • Howard v. Howard 469 A.2d 1318 N.H. 1983
    In Society for Protection of N.H. Forests v. Site Evaluation Comm., 115 N.H. 163, 173, 337 A.2d 778, 786 (1975), we stated that “[w]hile this court has repeatedly recognized the need for basic findings supported by the record, it has not mandated detailed and specific reasons for the basic findings.” See also Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979).
  • Town of Milford v. Johnson 451 A.2d 1295 N.H. 1982
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 119 (1979).
  • Bouthiette v. Wiggin 451 A.2d 368 N.H. 1982
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 751, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979); see Suojanen v. Tardif, 121 N.H. 1036, 1040, 437 A.2d 310, 312 (1981).
  • Heinze v. Heinze 444 A.2d 559 N.H. 1982
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979); R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976).
  • Silva v. Botsch 437 A.2d 313 N.H. 1981
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 752, 408 A.2d 113, 118 (1979); Morse v. Ford, 118 N.H. 280, 281, 385 A.2d 229, 230 (1978).
  • MacKay v. Breault 427 A.2d 1099 N.H. 1981
    Because there is substantial evidence supporting the decision of the master, Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749-50, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979), the judgment is Affirmed.
  • American Home Assurance Co. v. Star Speedway, Inc. 409 A.2d 1343 N.H. 1979
    The exceptions of American Home Assurance Company were transferred to this court by Goode, J., and give rise to the sole question before us. Whether or not American’s arguments were strained, the court did not specifically find bad faith or “obstinate, unjust, vexatious, wanton or oppressive conduct.” Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning Board, 119 N.H. 743, 408 A.2d 113 (1979).
  • Austin v. Ellis 408 A.2d 784 N.H. 1979
    Pugliese v. Steele, 119 N.H. 743, 408 A.2d 113 (1979); Seely v. Hand, 119 N.H. 303, 307, 402 A.2d 162, 166 (1979); Starvishv.