Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Beede, 406 A.2d 125.
-
State v. Scott Robinson
164 A.3d 1002
N.H. 2017
See, e.g., Holler, 123 N.H. at 200-01; State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 629-30 (1979) (discussing inevitable discovery doctrine).
-
State v. Robinson
973 A.2d 277
N.H. 2009
State v. Santana, 133 N.H. 798, 803 (1991); State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 625 (1979), cert.
-
State v. De La Cruz
969 A.2d 413
N.H. 2009
State v. Davis, 149 N.H. 698, 700 (2003); State v. Turmelle, 132 N.H. 148, 152 (1989); State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 625 (1979), cert.
-
State v. Pseudae
908 A.2d 809
N.H. 2006
The warrant requirement applies not only to criminal searches, but to noncriminal searches as well.
-
State v. Seavey
789 A.2d 621
N.H. 2001
The warrant requirement applies not only to criminal searches but to noncriminal searches as well.
-
State v. Hill
781 A.2d 979
N.H. 2001
State v. Holler, 123 N.H. 195, 200 (1983) (gun discovered on the floor of the defendant’s home protruding under a couch with butt readily observable would inevitably have been discovered during a subsequent legal search); State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 629-30 (1979), cert.
-
State v. Santana
586 A.2d 77
N.H. 1991
To have it otherwise “would [be to] obliterate one of the most fundamental distinctions between our form of government, where officers are under the law, and the police-state where they are the law.” Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 17 (1948), quoted in State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 628, 406 A.2d 125, 131 (1979), cert.
-
State v. Turmelle
562 A.2d 196
N.H. 1989
Under part I, article 19 of our State Constitution, a warrantless search is per se unreasonable and evidence derived from such a search is inadmissible unless the State proves that the search comes within one of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.
-
State v. Camargo
498 A.2d 292
N.H. 1985
A warrantless search may be justified under the New Hampshire Constitution when both probable'cause and exigent circumstances exist.
-
State v. Berthiaume
470 A.2d 893
N.H. 1983
Probable cause must, when challenged after a search, be shown to have existed before the search commenced.
-
State v. Ball
471 A.2d 347
N.H. 1983
I, art. 19); State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 625, 406 A.2d 125, 129 (1979), cert.
-
State v. McGann
467 A.2d 571
N.H. 1983
The State argues lastly that the inspection was legal because the officers had the proper justification for the warrantless search, whether the appropriate standard be a “reasonable suspicion,” State v. Feole, 121 N.H. 164, 167, 427 A.2d 43, 45 (1981), or “probable cause to believe” that a crime has been committed, State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 626, 406 A.2d 125, 129 (1979), cert.
-
State v. Holler
459 A.2d 1143
N.H. 1983
In State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 629-30, 406 A.2d 125, 132 (1979), cert.
-
State v. Settle
447 A.2d 1284
N.H. 1982
This court has historically viewed the rights of people in light of both the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire.
-
State v. Theodosopoulos
409 A.2d 1134
N.H. 1979
Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967); State v. Beede, 119 N.H. 620, 406 A.2d 125 (1979) (decided this day).