DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Noel, 404 A.2d 290.

13 citing documents.

  • State of New Hampshire v. Albert J. Boutin, III 134 A.3d 947 N.H. 2016
    These principles, as alluded to in Agueci, 310 F.2d at 828, establish that “[a]though the State must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on all the essential elements [of the charged offense], it may rely on circumstantial, rather than direct, evidence.” State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 527 (1979) (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Sylvia 616 A.2d 507 N.H. 1992
    State v. Hamel, 123 N.H. 670, 679, 466 A.2d 555, 560 (1983); State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 528, 404 A.2d 290, 293 (1979); State v. Goodwin, 118 N.H. 862, 867, 395 A.2d 1234, 1237 (1978); State v. Caldrain, 115 N.H. 390, 391-92, 342 A.2d 628, 629 (1975); State v. Warren, 114 N.H. 196, 197, 317 A.2d 566, 567 (1974).
  • State v. Guglielmo 544 A.2d 25 N.H. 1987
    .” RSA 626:4; see State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 528, 404 A.2d 290, 293 (1979).
  • State v. Sullivan 534 A.2d 384 N.H. 1987
    “Unless an accused understands his rights, there can be no voluntary, intelligent, and knowing waiver.” State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 525, 404 A.2d 290, 292 (1979); see United States v. Brown, 535 F.2d 424, 427 (8th Cir. 1976).
  • State v. Cote 530 A.2d 775 N.H. 1987
    The testimony on the issue was conflicting, and in such circumstances the trial judge is charged with assessing the witness’s credibility.
  • State v. Brodeur 493 A.2d 1134 N.H. 1985
    State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 526, 404 A.2d 290, 292 (1979); North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 373 (1979).
  • State v. Meloon 469 A.2d 1316 N.H. 1983
    Therefore, the fact that the defendant was found without any stolen items in his possession at the time of apprehension is not controlling *260 on the issue of the defendant’s intent at the time of his entry.
  • State v. Copeland 467 A.2d 238 N.H. 1983
    2d 244, 249, 234 N.E.2d 772, 775 (1968)); see also State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 526-27, 404 A.2d 290, 292-93 (1979).
  • State v. Berube 465 A.2d 509 N.H. 1983
    If the defendant had testified that he was not informed of his rights before being questioned, the trial court would have been correct in weighing the conflicting testimony in determining whether the State had met its burden of proof.
  • State v. Zysk 465 A.2d 480 N.H. 1983
    One’s mental and physical conditions are crucial in determining whether a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver has occurred.
  • State v. Bushey 453 A.2d 1265 N.H. 1982
    One factor which should be considered is the mental capability of the defendant.
  • State v. Nash 407 A.2d 365 N.H. 1979
    North Carolina v. Butler, 99 S. Ct. 1755 (1979); see State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 404 A.2d 290 (1979).
  • State v. Boone 406 A.2d 113 N.H. 1979
    State v. Noel, 119 N.H. 522, 404 A.2d 290 (1979); State v. Gilbert, 115 N.H. 665, 667, 348 A.2d 713, 715 (1975), and the motion was therefore properly denied.