DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Ouimette v. City of Somersworth & Agway Petroleum Corp., 402 A.2d 159.

14 citing documents.

  • Boccia v. City of Portsmouth 855 A.2d 516 N.H. 2004
    In Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 295 (1979), we declined, in dicta, to adopt a “practical difficulties” test for area variances because our general zoning statute requires a showing of unnecessary hardship for either type of variance.
  • Saturley v. Town of Hollis 533 A.2d 29 N.H. 1987
    is a narrow one,” Governor’s Island Club v. Town of Gilford, 124 N.H. 126, 130, 467 A.2d 246, 248 (1983), and the standard for determining unnecessary hardship is whether the “use of the particular property is unduly restricted by the zoning ordinance because of special conditions unique to that property which distinguish it from all others similarly restricted,” Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 295, 402 A.2d 159, 162 (1979).
  • Alexander v. Town of Hampstead 525 A.2d 276 N.H. 1987
    ered; (2) granting the permit would be of benefit to the public interest; (3) denial of the permit would result in unnecessary hardship to the owner seeking it; (4) granting the permit would do substantial justice; (5) the use must not be contrary to the spirit of the ordinance.’” *285 Moore v. City of Rochester, 121 N.H. 100, 101, 427 A.2d 10, 11 (1981) (quoting Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979)).
  • Biggs v. Town of Sandwich 470 A.2d 928 N.H. 1984
    suffered; (2) granting the permit would be of benefit to the public interest; (3) denial of the permit would result in unnecessary hardship to the owner seeking it; (4) granting the permit would do substantial justice; (5) the use must not be contrary to the spirit of the ordinance.” Moore v. City of Rochester, 121 N.H. 100, 101, 477 A.2d 10, 11 (1981) (quoting Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979)).
  • Richardson v. Town of Salisbury 455 A.2d 1059 N.H. 1983
    Home Util’s, Inc. v. Town of Bedford, 120 N.H. 812, 817, 424 A.2d 186, 189-90 (1980) (citations omitted); see Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 295, 402 A.2d 159, 162 (1979).
  • Colby v. Town of Rye 453 A.2d 1270 N.H. 1982
    Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979).
  • Stevens v. Town of Rye 448 A.2d 426 N.H. 1982
    Moore v. City of Rochester, 121 N.H. 100, 102, 427 A.2d 10, 11-12 (1981); Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294-95, 402 A.2d 159, 161-62 (1979); RSA 31:72 III.
  • Moore v. City of Rochester 427 A.2d 10 N.H. 1981
    Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979).
  • Associated Home Utilities, Inc. v. Town of Bedford 424 A.2d 186 N.H. 1980
    Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979); see 3 A. Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning § 38.01 at 38-4 (4th ed. 1956).
  • Sprague v. Town of Acworth 419 A.2d 1075 N.H. 1980
    Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 402 A.2d 159 (1979).
  • Little v. Town of Rye 419 A.2d 396 N.H. 1980
    l court must find that: “1) no diminution in value of surrounding properties would be suffered; 2) granting the permit would be of benefit to the public interest; 3) denial of the permit would result in unnecessary hardship to the owner seeking it; 4) granting the permit would do substantial justice; 5) the use must not be contrary to the spirit of the ordinance.” Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979).
  • Carey v. Town of Westmoreland 415 A.2d 333 N.H. 1980
    Rowe v. Town of Salem, 119 N.H. 505, 403 A.2d 428 (1979); Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 402 A.2d 159 (1979); Carbonneau v. Town of Exeter, 119 N.H. 259, 401 A.2d 675 (1979).
  • Criticized Carbonneau v. Town of Rye 411 A.2d 1110 N.H. 1980
    Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 294, 402 A.2d 159, 161 (1979); Rowe v. Town of Salem, 119 N.H. 505, 507, 403 A.2d 428, 429 (1979); Cook v. Town of Sanbornton, 118 N.H. 668, 670, 392 A.2d 1201, 1202 (1978).
  • Rowe v. Town of Salem 403 A.2d 428 N.H. 1979
    Ouimette v. City of Somersworth, 119 N.H. 292, 402 A.2d 159 (1979); Carbonneau v. Town of Exeter, 119 N.H. 259, 401 A.2d 675 (1979).