DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Reid v. Spadone MacHine Co., 404 A.2d 1094.

18 citing documents.

  • Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School District 733 A.2d 394 N.H. 1999
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 465, 404 A.2d 1094, 1099 (1979); see also 57A Am.
  • Price v. BIC Corp. 702 A.2d 330 N.H. 1997
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 463, 404 A.2d 1094, 1097 (1979), overruled in part by Daigle v. City of Portsmouth, 129 N.H. 561, 534 A.2d 689 (1987); Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 118 N.H. 802, 807, 395 A.2d 843, 846-47 (1978).
  • LeBlanc v. American Honda Motor Co. 688 A.2d 556 N.H. 1997
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 463-64, 404 A.2d 1094, 1098 (1979), overruled in part by Daigle v. City of Portsmouth, 129 N.H. 561, 534 A.2d 689 (1987); see Chellman, 138 N.H. at 79-80, 637 A.2d at 152.
  • Chellman v. Saab-Scania AB 637 A.2d 148 N.H. 1993
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 463, 404 A.2d 1094, 1098 (1979); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 402-A.
  • Thibeault v. Campbell 622 A.2d 212 N.H. 1993
    To inspect the product is no less a duty than to oversee the process of production.” Reid v. Spadone Mach.
  • LeFavor v. Ford 604 A.2d 570 N.H. 1992
    Reid v. Spadone Machine Co., 119 N.H. 457, 466, 404 A.2d 1094, 1100 (1979) (remittitur).
  • Daigle v. City of Portsmouth 534 A.2d 689 N.H. 1987
    Reid v. Spadone Machine Co., 119 N.H. 457, 466, 404 A.2d 1094, 1099-1100 (1979); Loney v. Parsons, 111 N.H. 353, 357-58, 284 A.2d 910, 913-14 (1971); see also Johnston v. Flatley Realty Investors, 125 N.H. 133, 137, 480 A.2d 55, 57-58 (1984).
  • Panas v. Harakis 529 A.2d 976 N.H. 1987
    In Reid v. Spadone Machine Company, 119 N.H. 457, 466, 404 A.2d 1094, 1100 *607 (1979), this court stated that it is the duty of the trial court “to correct or vacate what turns out to be an unfair result” (quoting Wisutskie, 88 N.H. at 245, 186 A. at 770).
  • Vincent v. Public Service Co. 529 A.2d 397 N.H. 1987
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 462, 404 A.2d 1094, 1097 (1979); Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 118 N.H. at 495-96, 389 A.2d at 431-32.
  • Weldy v. Town of Kingston 514 A.2d 1257 N.H. 1986
  • Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp. 498 A.2d 339 N.H. 1985
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 462, 404 A.2d 1094, 1097 (1979); Sargent v. Alton, 102 N.H. 476, 478, 160 A.2d 345, 346 (1960); R. Wiebusch, 5 New Hampshire Practice, Civil Practice and Procedure § 1578, at 294 (1984).
  • Drop Anchor Realty Trust Charlotte Marshall v. Hartford Fire Insurance 496 A.2d 339 N.H. 1985
    where there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the ruling.” Reid v. Spadone Mach.
  • Belanger v. Teague 490 A.2d 772 N.H. 1985
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 466, 404 A.2d 1094, 1100 (1979); cf. Wadsworth v. Russell, 108 N.H. 1, 226 A.2d 492 (1967) (new trial not required where plaintiff agreed to a remittitur of excess judgment).
  • Johnston v. Flatley Realty Investors 480 A.2d 55 N.H. 1984
    Co., 119 *137 N.H. 457, 466, 404 A.2d 1094, 1100 (1979) (quoting Wisutskie v. Malouin, 88 N.H. 242, 245, 186 A. 769, 770 (1936)).
  • Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 464 A.2d 288 N.H. 1983
    This holds true whether the product is misused by the plaintiff, see Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 118 N.H. at 809, 395 A.2d at 847, or by a third party, see Reid v. Spadone Mach.
  • Steel v. Bemis 431 A.2d 113 N.H. 1981
  • Carson v. Maurer 424 A.2d 825 N.H. 1980
    Co., 119 N.H. 457, 466, 404 A.2d 1094, 1099-1100 (1979) (reducing $150,000 award for loss of portion of three fingers to $125,000).
  • Kennedy v. Ricker 409 A.2d 778 N.H. 1979
    Reid v. Spadone Machine Co.; 119 N.H. 198, 404 A.2d 1094 (1979).