DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 403 A.2d 410.

14 citing documents.

  • Town of Windham v. Lawrence Savings Bank 776 A.2d 730 N.H. 2001
    RSA 674:35 (1996); Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448 (1979).
  • Neville v. Highfields Farm, Inc. 744 A.2d 89 N.H. 1999
    116 N.H. at 342, 358 A.2d at 666 (upholding town selectmen’s refusal to insert article in town warrant concerning issue over which planning board had exclusive jurisdiction); Buxton, 117 N.H. at 29, 369 A.2d at 189 (holding selectmen lacked jurisdiction to grant special exception because statute solely vested such authority in board of adjustment); Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 451-52, 403 A.2d 410, 414 (1979) (piercing device created to circumvent regulations and di
  • Bursey v. Town of Hudson 719 A.2d 577 N.H. 1998
    Stock is generally considered intangible personal property, see Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 450, 403 A.2d 410, 413 (1979), and ownership may be modified in a property settlement.
  • State v. Yee 523 A.2d 116 N.H. 1987
    Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979).
  • City of Portsmouth v. Karosis 498 A.2d 291 N.H. 1985
    delegated power can only do so in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of the enabling statute.’” Dugas v. Town of Conway, 125 N.H. 175, 181, 480 A.2d 71, 75 (1984) (quoting Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979)) (citations omitted).
  • Dugas v. Town of Conway 480 A.2d 71 N.H. 1984
    delegated power can only do so in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of the enabling statute.” Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979).
  • LSP Ass'n v. Town of Gilford Planning Board 446 A.2d 1183 N.H. 1982
    The town cites Town of Tuftonboro v. *539 Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 451-52, 403 A.2d 410, 413-14 (1979), for the proposition that courts, in determining when a sale has taken place, will look to the “economic reality” of the situation: what an association member actually gets in terms of a right to exclusive and definite occupancy of a specific piece of land.
  • Eddy Plaza Associates v. City of Concord 445 A.2d 1106 N.H. 1982
    Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, 120 N.H. 124, 126, 411 A.2d 1130, 1131 (1980) (citing Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979)).
  • Beck v. Town of Auburn 437 A.2d 289 N.H. 1981
    *999 Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448-49, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979).
  • Johnston v. Town of Exeter 436 A.2d 1147 N.H. 1981
    Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, 120 N.H. 124, 126, 411 A.2d 1130, 1131 (1980); see Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448, 403 A.2d 410, 411-12 (1979).
  • Town of Durham v. Cutter 428 A.2d 904 N.H. 1981
    Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 449, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979).
  • In Re Estate of Sayewich 413 A.2d 581 N.H. 1980
    Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 403 A.2d 410 *241 (1979).
  • Dearborn v. Town of Milford 411 A.2d 1132 N.H. 1980
    We have held that a town, in exercising its powers to regulate, may not expand upon the legislative definition of “subdivision.” Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Lebanon (decided this day); Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 403 A.2d 410 (1979).
  • Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lebanon 411 A.2d 1130 N.H. 1980
    Town of Tuftonboro v. Lakeside Colony, Inc., 119 N.H. 445, 448, 403 A.2d 410, 412 (1979).