DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 401 A.2d 201.

26 citing documents.

  • Porter v. Town of Sandwich 891 A.2d 521 N.H. 2006
    Dillman v. N.H. College, 150 N.H. 431, 434 (2003); Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235 (1979).
  • Dillman v. New Hampshire College 838 A.2d 1274 N.H. 2003
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235 (1979).
  • Hopkins v. Fleet Bank 724 A.2d 1287 N.H. 1999
    Bank of Boston, 75 F.3d 49, 53 (1st Cir. 1996) (quotations and brackets omitted); cf. Erin Foods Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Appeal of the Timberlane Regional School Board 713 A.2d 988 N.H. 1998
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd. 713 A.2d 982 N.H. 1998
    In those cases, the question of a contract term’s meaning “should be left to the trier of facts unless the meaning of the extrinsic evidence is so clear that reasonable men could only reach one conclusion.” Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • McCabe v. Arcidy 635 A.2d 446 N.H. 1993
    It is also settled that “reformation will only be *28 granted when the evidence is clear and convincing that (1) there was an actual agreement between the parties, (2) there was an agreement to put the agreement in writing and (3) there is a variance between the prior agreement and the writing.” Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 237, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979).
  • Holden Engineering & Surveying, Inc. v. Pembroke Road Realty Trust 628 A.2d 260 N.H. 1993
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Dubois v. Smith 599 A.2d 493 N.H. 1991
    J. CALAMARI & J. PERILLO, The Law of Contracts § 9-31, at 313 (2d ed. 1977); see 3 A. Corbin, Contracts §§ 614-16 (1960); 13 S. Williston, Law of Contracts §§ 1547-49 (3d ed. W. Jaeger 1970).” Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 237, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979) (emphasis in the original).
  • Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton 585 A.2d 312 N.H. 1991
    R. Zoppo Co. v. City of Dover, 124 N.H. 666, 671, 475 A.2d 12, 15 (1984); see Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Patterson v. Tirollo 581 A.2d 74 N.H. 1990
    “The law is well settled in this jurisdiction that reformation may be granted in a proper case where the instrument ‘fails to express the intention which the parties had in making the contract....’” Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 236, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979) (citations omitted).
  • Midway Excavators, Inc. v. Chandler 522 A.2d 982 N.H. 1986
    In Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 237, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979), this court stated that “reformation will only be granted when the evidence is clear and convincing that (1) there was an actual agreement between the parties, (2) there was an agreement to put the agreement in writing and (3) there is a vari *658 anee between the prior agreement and th
  • Dancart Corp. v. St. Albans Rubber Co. 474 A.2d 1020 N.H. 1984
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235-36, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Moore v. New Hampshire Insurance 444 A.2d 543 N.H. 1982
    Chagnon Lumber Co., Inc. v. DeMulder, 121 N.H. 173, 175, 427 A.2d 48, 50 (1981); see Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 237, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979).
  • Baker v. McCarthy 443 A.2d 138 N.H. 1982
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Gosselin v. Archibald 437 A.2d 302 N.H. 1981
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979); Thiem v. Thomas, 119 N.H. 598, 603, 406 A.2d 115, 118 (1979).
  • Summit Electric, Inc. v. Pepin Bros. Construction, Inc. 427 A.2d 505 N.H. 1981
    Erin Food Serv., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Hellas Family Restaurants, Inc. v. G & P Family Restaurants, Inc. 423 A.2d 613 N.H. 1980
    In order for a party to prevail in a reformation action, he must demonstrate by “clear and convincing [evidence] that (1) there was an actual agreement between the parties, (2) there was an agreement to put the agreement in writing and (3) there is a variance between the prior agreement and the writing.” Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 237, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979).
  • Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield 423 A.2d 980 N.H. 1980
    Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Grabowski v. Grabowski 422 A.2d 1040 N.H. 1980
    Erin Food Servs., Inc. v. 688 Props., 119 N.H. 232, 236-37, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979); Gagnon v. Pronovost, 97 N.H. 58, 60, 80 A.2d 381, 383 (1951); Tilton v. Tilton, 9 N.H. 385, 392 (1838).
  • Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Brown Co. 419 A.2d 1111 N.H. 1980
    Erin Food Services Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Murphy v. Doll-Mar, Inc. 419 A.2d 1106 N.H. 1980
    At the outset we note that “as a general rule the interpretation of a written instrument is an issue of law for this court to determine.” Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979).
  • Hynes v. Whitehouse 415 A.2d 876 N.H. 1980
    .’ This is consistent with his indifference and disregard for the rights of others.” A master’s findings and rulings will be upheld when the record discloses sufficient evidence to support them, Bourgeois v. Town of Bedford, 120 N.H. 145, 412 A.2d 1021 (1980); Merchants National Bank of Manchester v. Town of Exeter, 120 N.H. 157, 412 A.2d 1016 (1980); Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 401 A.2d 201 (1979), and they are not erroneous as a matter of law.
  • Cove-Craft Industries Inc. v. B. L. Armstrong Co. Ltd. 412 A.2d 1028 N.H. 1980
    Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 401 A.2d 201 (1979).
  • Thayer v. Thayer 409 A.2d 1326 N.H. 1979
    Beaudoin v. Beaudoin, 118 N.H. 325, 327, 386 A.2d 1261, 1263 (1978); Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 401 A.2d 201, 204 (1979).
  • Bower v. Davis & Symonds Lumber Co. 406 A.2d 119 N.H. 1979
    Draft No. 1-7 1973); accord, Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 235, 401 A.2d 201, 203 (1979); O’Donnell v. Cray, 109 N.H. 223, 225, 248 A.2d 83, 84 (1968).
  • MacLeod v. Chalet Susse International, Inc. 401 A.2d 205 N.H. 1979
    Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 Properties, 119 N.H. 232, 401 A.2d 201 (1979).