DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Sargent Lake Ass'n v. Dane, 393 A.2d 559.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Field 571 A.2d 1276 N.H. 1990
    “Our only function [on review] is to determine whether a reasonable [person] could have reached the same decision as the [trial court] on the basis of the evidence before [it].” Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Bourdon's Case 565 A.2d 1052 N.H. 1989
    In reviewing the referee’s findings, “our only function is to determine whether a reasonable [person] could have reached the same decision as the [referee] on the basis of the evidence before him.” Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978); see also Fitzpatrick’s Case, 132 N.H. 211, 214, 566 A.2d 157, 159 (1989).
  • Fitzpatrick's Case 566 A.2d 157 N.H. 1989
    reviewing the referee’s findings in a bar disciplinary case to determine “‘whether a reasonable [person] could have reached the same decision as the [referee] on the basis of the evidence before him.’” Woiccak’s Case, 131 N.H. 735, 741, 561 A.2d 1049, 1052 (1989) (quoting Edes’ Case, 118 N.H. 815, 817, 395 A.2d 498, 499 (1978), itself quoting Sargent Lake Association v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978)).
  • Woiccak's Case 561 A.2d 1049 N.H. 1989
    The standard of review in this case requires us to determine “ ‘whether a reasonable [person] could have reached the same decision as the [referee] on the basis of the evidence before him.’” Edes’ Case, 118 N.H. 815, 817, 395 A.2d 498, 499 (1978) (quoting Sargent Lake Association v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978)).
  • Realco Equities, Inc. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 540 A.2d 1220 N.H. 1988
    ‘Our only function is to determine whether a reasonable man could have reached the same decision as the master on the basis of the evidence before him.’ ” Bower v. Davis & Symonds Lumber Co., 119 N.H. 605, 609, 406 A.2d 119, 122 (1979) (quoting Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978)).
  • Zimmerman v. Suissevale, Inc. 438 A.2d 290 N.H. 1981
    Chagnon Lumber Co., Inc. v. DeMulder, 121 N.H. 173, 175, 427 A.2d 48, 50 (1981); Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Taylor v. Gagne 437 A.2d 262 N.H. 1981
    Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Shaka v. Shaka 424 A.2d 802 N.H. 1980
    Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 721, 393 A.2d 559, 560 (1978); Gordon v. Gordon, 117 N.H. 862, 865-66, 379 A.2d 810, 813 (1977).
  • Hynes v. Whitehouse 415 A.2d 876 N.H. 1980
    “Although several different reasonable calculations of damages could have been reached based on the evidence presented, it is not our function to evaluate the facts and determine the *422 damages as if we were sitting as the trier of fact.” Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Cricenti v. Bewley 415 A.2d 675 N.H. 1980
    Heston v. Ouster, 119 N.H. 58, 62, 398 A.2d 536, 539 (1979); Sargent Lake Ass’n. v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Jenney v. Vining 415 A.2d 681 N.H. 1980
    Sargent Lake Association v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 393 A.2d 559 (1978).
  • Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. Foster 406 A.2d 1310 N.H. 1979
    Sargent Lake Association v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 393 A.2d 559 (1978).
  • Bower v. Davis & Symonds Lumber Co. 406 A.2d 119 N.H. 1979
    “Our only function is to determine whether a reasonable man could have reached the same decision as the master on the basis of the evidence before him.” Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • McGrath v. City of Manchester 398 A.2d 842 N.H. 1979
    Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 721-22, 393 A.2d 559, 561 *112 (1978).
  • Heston v. Ousler 398 A.2d 536 N.H. 1979
    Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Erin Realty Co. v. 688 Properties 395 A.2d 515 N.H. 1978
    Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 393 A.2d 559 (1978).
  • Edes' Case 395 A.2d 498 N.H. 1978
    Our function in this case is to determine “whether a reasonable man could have reached the same decision as the master on the basis of the evidence before him.” Sargent Lake Association v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).
  • Humiston v. Bushnell 394 A.2d 844 N.H. 1978
    “Our only function is to determine whether a reasonable man could have reached the same decision as the master on the basis of the evidence before him.” Sargent Lake Ass’n v. Dane, 118 N.H. 720, 722, 393 A.2d 559, 561 (1978).