DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 389 A.2d 940.

13 citing documents.

  • George Nicolaou v. Marilyn J. Taylor & a. N.H. 2017
    Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536 (1978).
  • Burke v. Pierro 986 A.2d 538 N.H. 2009
    “The interpretation of deeds is ultimately for this court; however, our determination of the terms of a deed is based on the parties’ intentions as properly found by the trial court.” Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536 (1978).
  • In re Monadnock 790 A.2d 786 N.H. 2002
    Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536 (1978).
  • Flanagan v. Prudhomme 644 A.2d 51 N.H. 1994
    Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 942 (1978).
  • Dumont v. Town of Wolfeboro 622 A.2d 1238 N.H. 1993
    Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978).
  • Quality Discount Market Corp. v. Laconia Planning Board 571 A.2d 271 N.H. 1990
    The law in New Hampshire is that “our determination of the terms of a[n] [instrument] is based on the parties’ intentions as properly found by the trial court.” Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978).
  • Seward v. Loranger 547 A.2d 207 N.H. 1988
    MacKay v. Breault, 121 N.H. 135, 139, 427 A.2d 1099, 1101 (1981) (citing Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978)).
  • Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi 519 A.2d 297 N.H. 1986
    Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978).
  • Ouellette v. Butler 480 A.2d 76 N.H. 1984
    While the interpretation of deeds and analogous instruments is ultimately a matter for this court, see Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978), our determination of their terms “is based on the parties’ intentions as properly found by the trial court.” Id.
  • Sorenson v. Wilson 476 A.2d 244 N.H. 1984
    “The interpretation of deeds is ultimately for this court____” Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978).
  • Davis v. Lemire 449 A.2d 1228 N.H. 1982
    Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978).
  • Clark v. Neergaard 434 A.2d 599 N.H. 1981
    Although the interpretation of a deed is ultimately a matter for this court, “our determination of the terms of a deed is based on the parties’ intentions as properly found by the trial court.” MacKay v. Breault, 121 N.H. 135, 139, 427 A.2d 1099, 1101 (1981) (quoting Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978)); Woolsey v. Carmichael, 117 N.H. 1050, 1051, 381 A.2d 328, 329 (1977).
  • MacKay v. Breault 427 A.2d 1099 N.H. 1981
    “The interpretation of deeds is ultimately for this court; however, our determination of the terms of a deed is based on the parties’ intentions as properly found by the trial court.” Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc., 118 N.H. 534, 536, 389 A.2d 940, 941 (1978).