DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Archambault v. Adams, 392 A.2d 139.

13 citing documents.

  • Hynes v. Whitehouse 415 A.2d 876 N.H. 1980
    “Credibility as well as weight given to testimony is a question of fact for the court and if the findings could reasonably be made on all the evidence they must stand.” Gordon v. Gordon, 117 N.H. 862, 865-66, 379 A.2d 810, 813 (1977); see Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 638, 392 A.2d 139, 142 (1978).
  • Bourgeois v. Town of Bedford 412 A.2d 1021 N.H. 1980
    Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 638, 392 A.2d 139, 142 (1978); see Aetna Insurance Co. v. American Ski Corp., 119 N.H. 974, 409 A.2d 1356 (1979).
  • Rinden v. Hicks 408 A.2d 417 N.H. 1979
    In this jurisdiction the findings of the trial court will not be set aside if they could reasonably be made on the evidence.
  • Lapierre v. Maltais 406 A.2d 123 N.H. 1979
    The factual findings of the trial court “will not be set aside if they could reasonably be made on the evidence.” Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 638, 392 A.2d 139, 142 (1978).
  • State v. Boisvert 400 A.2d 48 N.H. 1979
  • Juvenile Case 1089 398 A.2d 65 N.H. 1979
    We affirm all factual findings of the district court because they could reasonably have been made on the evidence.
  • NH Pub. Util. Comm'n v. Naughton 394 A.2d 311 N.H. 1978
    Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 392 A.2d 139 (1978); Hardware Mut.
  • Humiston v. Bushnell 394 A.2d 844 N.H. 1978
    We will reverse the finding of the factfinder when it cannot “reasonably be made on the evidence,” Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 638, 392 A.2d 139, 142 (1978), or when it “can be said to be erroneous.” Beaudoin v. Beaudoin, 118 N.H. 325, 327, 386 A.2d 1261, 1263 (1978).
  • Town of Rumney v. Banel 394 A.2d 323 N.H. 1978
    The trial court’s findings, if reasonably made, are binding on this court.
  • New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission v. Naughton 394 A.2d 311 N.H. 1978
    Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 392 A.2d 139 (1978); Hardware Mut.
  • Sargent Lake Ass'n v. Dane 393 A.2d 559 N.H. 1978
    “Credibility as well as weight given to testimony is a question of fact for the court and if the findings could reasonably be made on all the evidence they must stand.” Gordon v. Gordon, 117 N.H. 862, 865, 866, 379 A.2d 810, 813 (1977); Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 392 A.2d 139 (1978).
  • Kane v. New Hampshire State Liquor Commission 393 A.2d 555 N.H. 1978
    We have repeatedly stated that our *709 standard for review when we are asked to invalidate a lower tribunal’s factual determination is whether or not the master’s finding “could reasonably be made on all the evidence.” Gordon v. Gordon, 117 N.H. 862, 865, 379 A.2d 810, 813; Archambault v. Adams, 118 N.H. 634, 392 A.2d 139 (1978).
  • Wilson v. Shea 393 A.2d 565 N.H. 1978
    These findings could reasonably be made on the evidence and therefore must be upheld.