Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Royer v. State Department of Employment Security, 394 A.2d 828.

32 citing documents.

  • State of New Hampshire v. Justin Spirko N.H. 2024
    id.; Petition of Brooks, 140 N.H. 813, 816 (1996); Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Miles Brown & a. v. Secretary of State N.H. 2023
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 678 (1978) (adopting Supreme Court’s balancing test); Lennartz v. Oak Point Assocs., 167 N.H. 459, 462-63 (2015) (referring to the rational basis test, intermediate scrutiny, and strict scrutiny standards by which courts review equal protection challenges and explaining the intermediate scrutiny standard in detail).
  • State of New Hampshire v. Grace Woodham N.H. 2023
    Nevertheless, “[m]ootness is not subject to rigid rules, but is a matter of convenience and discretion.” Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • State of New Hampshire v. Nyok Deng Luwal N.H. 2022
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Londonderry School District SAU 12 v. State 958 A.2d 930 N.H. 2008
    II, art. 83; *737 see also Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Bio Energy, LLC v. Town of Hopkinton 891 A.2d 509 N.H. 2005
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Asmussen v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Safety 766 A.2d 678 N.H. 2000
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • In re Thayer 761 A.2d 1052 N.H. 2000
    at 276, 575 A.2d at 1318-19 (quotation omitted), but may review a question that has become moot if it involves a significant constitutional question or an issue of significant public concern, Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • In re Baby K. 722 A.2d 470 N.H. 1998
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 678, 394 A.2d 828, 831 (1978) (quotation omitted); see also Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).
  • Concord Orthopaedics Professional Ass'n v. Forbes 702 A.2d 1273 N.H. 1997
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 675, 394 A.2d 828, 829 (1978) (quotation and citation omitted); see also Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 148 (1975).
  • Appeal of Mascoma Valley Regional School District 677 A.2d 679 N.H. 1996
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 675, 394 A.2d 828, 829 (1978) (mootness doctrine may be avoided when issues are capable of repetition, yet likely to evade review).
  • In re Brooks 678 A.2d 140 N.H. 1996
    at 276, 575 A.2d at 1318-19 (quotation omitted), but may review a question that has become moot if it involves a significant constitutional question or an issue of significant public concern, Royer v. State Dep't of Empl.
  • Snow's Case 674 A.2d 573 N.H. 1996
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Cushing v. Gregg 629 A.2d 779 N.H. 1993
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • In re Tocci 624 A.2d 548 N.H. 1993
    Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 (1985); Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Chambers v. Gregg 606 A.2d 811 N.H. 1992
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 675, 394 A.2d 828, 829 (1978) (quoting Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 148 (1975)), mootness does not prevent us from deciding this case on the merits.
  • Smith v. Truglia 599 A.2d 122 N.H. 1991
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 675, 394 A.2d 828, 829 (1978) (quoting Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 148 (1975)).
  • Appeal of Hinsdale Federation of Teachers 575 A.2d 1316 N.H. 1990
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Guy J. v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Education 565 A.2d 397 N.H. 1989
    Royer v. State Dept. of Empl.
  • State v. Gagne 523 A.2d 76 N.H. 1986
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 675, 394 A.2d 828, 829 (1978), that constitutional right being that of a defendant not to be tried before an adversary hearing if he or she is legally incompetent.
  • Kenneth E. Curran, Inc. v. Auclair Transportation, Inc. 519 A.2d 280 N.H. 1986
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Ladd v. Coleman 517 A.2d 811 N.H. 1986
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 678, 394 A.2d 828, 831 (1978) (citing Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)).
  • Moody v. Cunningham 503 A.2d 819 N.H. 1986
    Royer v. State Dept. of Employment Security, 118 N.H. 673, 675, 394 A.2d 828, 829 (1978); Proctor v. Butler, 117 N.H. 927, 930, 380 A.2d 673, 674-75 (1977).
  • Appeal of Eno 495 A.2d 1277 N.H. 1985
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • City of Claremont v. Truell 489 A.2d 581 N.H. 1985
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • State v. Cook 481 A.2d 823 N.H. 1984
    Royer v. Slate Dep’t of Empl.
  • Petition of Clark 451 A.2d 1303 N.H. 1982
    denied, 447 U.S. 935 (1980); see Town of Bethlehem v. Tucker, 119 N.H. 927, 929, 409 A.2d 1334, 1335 (1979); Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. Belknap County 448 A.2d 969 N.H. 1982
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 681, 394 A.2d 828, 833 (1978) (Douglas, J., concurring); see, e.g., Monitor Publishing Co. v. Hill, 103 N.H. 397, 402, 173 A.2d 725, 727 (1961); Textile Workers Union v. Textron, 99 N.H. 385, 387, 111 A.2d 823, 824 (1955).
  • Royer v. Adams 437 A.2d 316 N.H. 1981
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 394 A.2d 828 (1978) (hereinafter referred to as Royer I), and remanded for issuance of a final order.
  • Appeal of Fournier v. State 428 A.2d 1238 N.H. 1981
    Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Appeal of The Portsmouth Trust Co. 423 A.2d 603 N.H. 1980
    at 84-85; Royer v. State Dep’t of Empl.
  • Town of Bethlehem v. Tucker 409 A.2d 1334 N.H. 1979
    Security, 118 N.H. 673, 394 A.2d 828 (1978); Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. at 579.