DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Vigneault v. Travelers Insurance, 382 A.2d 910.

17 citing documents.

  • Allstate Insurance v. Armstrong 738 A.2d 1280 N.H. 1999
    Co., 125 N.H. 38, 44, 480 A.2d 14, 19 (1984); see also Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Deyette v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 703 A.2d 661 N.H. 1997
    An insured can “reasonably expect[] to be protected against uninsured motorists up to the amount for which he paid.” Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Gisonni v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 687 A.2d 709 N.H. 1996
    Co., 118 N.H. 168, 385 A.2d 105 (1978); Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Green Mountain Insurance v. George 634 A.2d 1011 N.H. 1993
    Under the rule established in Vigneault v. Travelers Insurance Co., 118 N.H. 75, 79, 382 A.2d 910, 913 (1978), the Georges may recover the difference between their uninsured motorist coverage and that which they can recover from the alleged tortfeasor.
  • Anderson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 594 A.2d 1293 N.H. 1991
    Co., 118 N.H. 75, 79, 382 A.2d 910, 913 (1978), the damages used to calculate the required payment may be set off by amounts recovered from other tort-feasors, cf. Langston v. Allstate Ins.
  • Cacavas v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. 512 A.2d 423 N.H. 1986
    Since the legislature created an option for additional coverage, it intended that those choosing to buy increased protection should receive its benefits.” 125 N.H. at 45, 480 A.2d at 19 (quoting Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Hartford Insurance v. White 484 A.2d 1222 N.H. 1984
    White argues that under Courtemanche v. Lumberman’s Mutual Casualty Co., 118 N.H. 168, 385 A.2d 105 (1978) and Vigneault v. Travelers Insurance Co., 118 N.H. 75, 382 A.2d 910 (1978), she is entitled to stack the uninsured motorist coverage under the two policies to determine the total amount of coverage available, and that she then needs to deduct only once the $25,000 recovered from the driver.
  • Descoteaux v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 480 A.2d 14 N.H. 1984
    Co., 118 N.H. 168, 385 A.2d 105 (1978); Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Orthopedic Professional Ass'n 480 A.2d 840 N.H. 1984
    Co., 118 N.H. 75, 382 A.2d 910 (1978); Gay v. Preferred Risk Mut.
  • Boyce v. Concord General Mutual Insurance 435 A.2d 510 N.H. 1981
  • Grimes v. Concord General Mutual Insurance 422 A.2d 1312 N.H. 1980
  • Bertolami v. Merchants Mutual Insurance 414 A.2d 1281 N.H. 1980
    Co., 118 N.H. 168, 385 A.2d 105 (1978); Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Parker v. Amica Mutual Insurance 395 A.2d 507 N.H. 1978
  • Storms v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 388 A.2d 578 N.H. 1978
    Co., 114 N.H. 704, 327 A.2d 608 (1974); cf. Vigneault v. Travelers Insurance Co., 118 N.H. 75, 382 A.2d 910 (1978).
  • Courtemanche v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 385 A.2d 105 N.H. 1978
    Co., 116 N.H. 210, 213, 357 A.2d 873, 876 (1976) overruled in part, Vigneault v. Travelers Ins.
  • Allstate Insurance v. O'Shaughnessy 384 A.2d 486 N.H. 1978
    Defendant Hodgdon’s argument that because his damages exceed coverage by both those policies he should also obtain coverage under the uninsured motorist provision of his own policy is foreclosed by our decisions in Brack v. Middlesex Mutual Insurance Co., 118 N.H. 72, 382 A.2d 914 (1978), and Vigneault v. Travelers Insurance Co., 118 N.H. 75, 382 A.2d 910 (1978), decided this day.
  • Brack v. Middlesex Mutual Insurance 382 A.2d 914 N.H. 1978
    Our statute presently does not authorize an extension of uninsured motorist coverage to the case before us. Under the rule established in Vigneault v. Travelers Insurance Company, 118 N.H. 75, 382 A.2d 910 (1978) the insured may recover only the difference between the amount of her damages or the uninsured motorist coverage, whichever is less, and the tortfeasor’s liability coverage when the tortfeasor is uninsured, i.e., less than $20,000 liability coverage.