DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite State v. Butler, 379 A.2d 827.

13 citing documents.

  • State of New Hampshire v. Christopher T. Dastrup N.H. 2020
    State v. Leclair, 118 N.H. 214, 219 (1978); State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 891 (1977).
  • State v. Duffy 778 A.2d 415 N.H. 2001
    State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 891 (1977) (reminding law enforcement officials of the dangers of suppression when relying upon implied waivers alone).
  • State v. Patten 631 A.2d 921 N.H. 1993
    State v. Stetson, 135 N.H. 267, 269, 603 A.2d 498, 499 (1992) (defendant gained misleading advantage when hearsay evidence admitted into evidence); see also State v. Judkins, 128 N.H. 223, 225, 512 A.2d 427, 428-29 (1986); State v. Benoit, 126 N.H. 6, 21, 490 A.2d 295, 305 (1985); State v. Brown, 125 N.H. 346, 351-52, 480 A.2d 901, 905-06 (1984); State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 891-92, 379 A.2d 827, 829-30 (1977).
  • State v. Allen 577 A.2d 801 N.H. 1990
    State v. LeClair, 118 N.H. 214, 216-17, 385 A.2d 831, 832 (1978); State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 890, 379 A.2d 827, 829 (1977).
  • State v. Benoit 490 A.2d 295 N.H. 1985
    before statements made by a defendant during custodial interrogation may be considered as evidence, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, State v. Phinney, 117 N.H. 145, 147, 370 A.2d 1153, 1154 (1977), that the defendant was warned of his constitutional rights, see State v. Nash, 119 N.H. 728, 730-31, 407 A.2d 365, 367 (1979), that the defendant waived those rights, State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 891, 379 A.2d 827, 829 (1977), and that the statements were made voluntarily, knowingly a
  • State v. Crosman 484 A.2d 1095 N.H. 1984
    See, e.g., State v. Brown, 125 N.H. 346, 480 A.2d 901 (1984); State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 379 A.2d 872 (1977); Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971).
  • State v. Brown 480 A.2d 901 N.H. 1984
    State v. Perron, 122 N.H. 941, 949, 454 A.2d 422, 426 (1982); State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 891-92, 379 A.2d 827, 829-30 (1977); see also People v. Loden, 31 Ill.
  • State v. Tapply 470 A.2d 900 N.H. 1983
    This case, however, illustrates the danger of relying on an implied waiver, as we warned in State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 891, 379 A.2d 827, 829 (1977).
  • State v. Beaupre 459 A.2d 233 N.H. 1983
    Although we have ruled upon the admissibility of statements made by an accused during custodial interrogation after he asks to confer with counsel, see, e.g., State v. Nash, 119 N.H. 728, 731-33, 407 A.2d 365, 367-68 (1979); State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 890-91, 379 A.2d 827, 829 (1977), we have not previously had the opportunity to apply the rule of Edwards.
  • Followed State v. Nash 407 A.2d 365 N.H. 1979
    We follow the reasoning of the latter cases, allowing a defendant to waive his right to counsel after he has asserted it.
  • State v. Gullick 396 A.2d 554 N.H. 1978
    at 444; accord, United States v. Christian, 571 F.2d 64, 69 (1st Cir. 1978); see State v. Butler, 117 N.H. 888, 379 A.2d 827 (1977).
  • State v. Arthur 391 A.2d 884 N.H. 1978
    The allegedly prejudicial answers given by the officer were in response to defense counsel’s questions.
  • State v. LeClair 385 A.2d 831 N.H. 1978
    We have recently had occasion to comment upon the impropriety of one-man showups.