DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 367 A.2d 1041.

14 citing documents.

  • In re Sanborn 545 A.2d 726 N.H. 1988
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 143, 384 A.2d 132, 133 (1978); Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 827-28, 367 A.2d 1041, 1043 (1976).
  • State v. Robb 484 A.2d 1130 N.H. 1984
    Later changes in statutory and case law, however, gave him that right, see Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976), and he was recommitted in 1977, 1979, and 1981.
  • State v. Ballou 481 A.2d 260 N.H. 1984
    Finally, in Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976), we said that the “[e]ssential elements in a commitment hearing are the nature of the burden of proof and on whom it is imposed.” Id.
  • State v. Paradis 455 A.2d 1070 N.H. 1983
    Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 827, 367 A.2d 1041, 1042 (1977); Jackson v. *71 Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 723-24 (1972); Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107, 111-12 (1966).
  • Opinion of the Justices 442 A.2d 594 N.H. 1982
    Previously, in Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, *203 828-29, 367 A.2d 1041, 1043-44 (1976), we had held that a reasonable doubt standard of proof was constitutionally required in criminal recommitment hearings.
  • State v. Novosel 412 A.2d 739 N.H. 1980
    Anticipating this court’s decision in Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976), the court ordered Novosel’s commitment reviewed in two years.
  • State v. Steeves 406 A.2d 111 N.H. 1979
    LAMPRON, C.J. This is an action for modification of a recommitment order entered in compliance with Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976).
  • Grindle v. Miller 400 A.2d 787 N.H. 1979
    RSA 135-B:38; RSA 651:ll-a (Supp. 1977); see Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976).
  • Hudson v. Miller 399 A.2d 612 N.H. 1979
    We hold that plaintiff’s current incarceration constitutes a denial of his right to equal protection of the laws under the State and Federal Constitutions because it allows for indefinite internment without automatic review.
  • State v. ROBERT H. ____ 393 A.2d 1387 N.H. 1978
    Involuntary commitment proceedings, “whether civil or criminal,” involve a deprivation of liberty “which constitutes a grievous loss.” Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 828, 367 A.2d 1041, 1043 (1976), and State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978).
  • State v. Gregoire 384 A.2d 132 N.H. 1978
    For the order to be renewed, another judicial hearing must be held.” In Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976), we held that in a criminal re-commitment hearing the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a patient’s present mental condition is such that it would be dangerous for him to be at large.
  • Novosel v. Helgemoe 384 A.2d 124 N.H. 1978
    State v. Gregoire, 118 N.H. 140, 384 A.2d 132 (1978), decided this day; Proctor v. Butler, 117 N.H. 927, 380 A.2d 673 (1977); see Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976).
  • Proctor v. Butler 380 A.2d 673 N.H. 1977
    This we acknowledged when in Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 828, 367 A.2d 1041, 1043 (1976), we noted “It is clear that in involuntary confinement hearings, whether civil or criminal, the person involved is deprived of his liberty which constitutes a grievous loss.” The state’s principal objection to a reasonable doubt standard is that it is “unworkable and weighs the scale
  • State v. Kupchun 373 A.2d 1325 N.H. 1977
    This court held in Gibbs v. Helgemoe, 116 N.H. 825, 367 A.2d 1041 (1976), that such a confinement is subject to the provisions of RSA 651:11-a (Supp. 1975), which requires that a judicial hearing for its renewal be held on or before July 1,1977, or the original order of commitment shall then become null and void.