Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 367 A.2d 588.

15 citing documents.

  • Appeal of Sawmill Brook Development Co. 529 A.2d 902 N.H. 1987
    The questions we decide are whether the board’s decision was erroneous as a matter of law, see RSA 79-A:10 (Supp. 1986); RSA 76:16-a, V (Supp. 1986), and whether the denial of the taxpayer’s motion for rehearing was an abuse of discretion, see Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 779, 367 A.2d 588, 592 (1976).
  • Appeal of Net Realty Holding Trust 519 A.2d 313 N.H. 1986
    Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 782, 367 A.2d 588, 593 (1976).
  • Appeal of Loudon Road Realty Trust 517 A.2d 843 N.H. 1986
    The parties’ evidence diverged principally on the issues of the applicable economic rent, see Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 780-82, 367 A.2d 588, 592-93 (1976), and the vacancy rate in the market area.
  • Coliseum Vickerry Realty Co. Trust v. City of Nashua 493 A.2d 460 N.H. 1985
    In Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 781-82, 367 A.2d 588, 593 (1976), we considered whether the board of taxation had properly refused to consider actual rents in applying the income capitalization approach.
  • City of Manchester v. Town of Auburn 480 A.2d 60 N.H. 1984
    App. 324, 334, 227 N.W.2d 358, 363 (1975); cf. Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 782, 367 A.2d 588, 593 (1976) (long-term leases); Trustees of the Phillips-Exeter Academy v. Exeter, 92 N.H. 473, 487, 33 *158 A.2d 665, 674 (1943) (“uses dependent upon the personal element of the user are not an element of the property in its transfer, payment for which is the keynote of value”).
  • Appeal of Public Service Co. 471 A.2d 1182 N.H. 1984
    Steele v. Town of Allenstown, 124 N.H. 487, 471 A.2d 1179 (1984); Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 781, 367 A.2d 588, 593 (1976); Royal Gardens Co. v. Concord, 114 N.H. 668, 671-72, 328 A.2d 123, 124-25 (1974), and cases cited therein.
  • Steele v. Town of Allenstown 471 A.2d 1179 N.H. 1984
    state and federal control of income is taken into account.” Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 781, 367 A.2d 588, 593 (1976).
  • Appeal of Harvey Road Associates VII 440 A.2d 11 N.H. 1982
    RSA 76:16-a V (Supp. 1979); see Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 779, 367 A.2d 588, 592 (1976); Dartmouth Corp. of Alpha Delta v. Hanover, 115 N.H. 26, 27-28, 332 A.2d 390, 391 (1975).
  • Brickman v. City of Manchester 409 A.2d 1328 N.H. 1979
    Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 367 A.2d 588 (1976).
  • Berthiaume v. City of Nashua 392 A.2d 143 N.H. 1978
    Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 780, 367 A.2d 588, 592 (1976); Paras v. City of Portsmouth, 115 N.H. 63, 67-68, 335 A.2d 304, 307-08 (1975).
  • Rousseau v. Town of Allenstown 380 A.2d 1100 N.H. 1977
    All parties agree the appeal is not timely under the clear 30-day ruling in Demoulas v. Town of Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 367 A.2d 588 (1976).
  • Wilson v. Personnel Commission 378 A.2d 1375 N.H. 1977
    Alexander v. Oxford School District, 117 N.H. 641, 377 A.2d 127 (1977); Demoulas v. Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 367 A.2d 588 (1976).
  • Towers v. Department of Employment Security Continental Shoe Co. 376 A.2d 136 N.H. 1977
    the propriety of the abatement decision in an appeal from a denial of a rehearing.
  • Amsler v. Town of South Hampton 374 A.2d 959 N.H. 1977
    Because the events in this case occurred prior to the effective date of the rules laid down in Demonios v. Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 367 A.2d 588 (1976), we need not discuss what impact those rules would have upon the procedural posture of this case.
  • Pelham Plaza v. Town of Pelham 370 A.2d 638 N.H. 1977
    The plaintiff did not appeal this decision within thirty days as required by RSA 76:16-a V (Supp. 1975) and Demoulas v. Salem, 116 N.H. 775, 367 A.2d 588 (1976).