DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 367 A.2d 583.

26 citing documents.

  • Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co. 62 A.3d 754 N.H. 2013
    Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760 (1976), in arguing that it is entitled to recover against Turner on a theory of unjust enrichment.
  • Rood v. Moore 807 A.2d 1225 N.H. 2002
  • Drucker's Case 577 A.2d 1198 N.H. 1990
    R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976).
  • Robert E. Tardiff, Inc. v. Twin Oaks Realty Trust 546 A.2d 1062 N.H. 1988
    Berke v. Griffin, 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976).” Grant v. Newton supra.
  • Howard v. Howard 531 A.2d 331 N.H. 1987
    This may be done in narrative form, R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976), and the essential rulings of law may be likewise explained.
  • Parem Contracting Corp. v. Welch Construction Co. 512 A.2d 1104 N.H. 1986
    The trial court was not required to accept Welch’s damages schedule, see R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 766, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976), for Welch faced “the risk of non-persuasion” with respect to its counterclaim, see Spilene v. Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co., 79 N.H. 326, 328, 108 A. 808, 809 (1920).
  • V & V Corp. v. American Policyholders' Insurance 500 A.2d 695 N.H. 1985
    The statutory intendment of providing this court with those questions of law “arising on the facts found by the trial court, as distinguished from the evidence,” R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976), continues to be satisfied by the narrative format.
  • Burgess v. Queen 470 A.2d 861 N.H. 1983
    R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 764, 367 A.2d 583, 586 (1976).
  • Taylor v. Davidson Rubber Co. 445 A.2d 1119 N.H. 1982
    ” R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976).
  • Heinze v. Heinze 444 A.2d 559 N.H. 1982
    Pugliese v. Town of Northwood, 119 N.H. 743, 749, 408 A.2d 113, 117 (1979); R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976).
  • Surprenant v. Laporte 444 A.2d 552 N.H. 1982
    Because the narrative of the master’s report found facts that were consistent with the Perreault standard, see Heinze v. Heinze, 122 N.H. 358, 362, 444 A.2d 559, 562 (1982); R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976), we affirm.
  • Clinical Lab Products, Inc. v. Martina 437 A.2d 285 N.H. 1981
    R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 766-67, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976).
  • Progressive Survey, Inc. v. Pearson 410 A.2d 1123 N.H. 1980
    Grant v. Town of Newton, 117 N.H. 159, 370 A.2d 285 (1977); see R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976); Trudeau v. Company, 89 N.H. 83, 192 A. 491 (1937).
  • Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning Board 408 A.2d 113 N.H. 1979
    Plaintiff agrees that this statute does not require specific rulings on every request filed, and is complied with “if the trial court files in narrative form the findings of essential facts which are sufficient to support his decision.” R. J. Berks & Co., Inc. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976); Kopka Real Estate, Inc. v. MacLeod, 119 N.H. 547, 404 A.2d 298 (1979); Cote v. Eldeen, 119 N.H. 491, 403 A.2d 419 (1979).
  • Kopka Real Estate, Inc. v. MacLeod 404 A.2d 298 N.H. 1979
    We have held that RSA 491:15 is complied with “if the trial court files in narrative form, the findings of essential facts which are sufficient to support his decision.” R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976); Cote v. Eldeen, 119 N.H. 491, 403 A.2d 419 (1979).
  • Cote v. Eldeen 403 A.2d 419 N.H. 1979
    The purpose of the statute “is fulfilled if the trial court files, in narrative form, the findings of essential facts which are sufficient to support his decision.” R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976) (citations omitted).
  • Smith v. State 394 A.2d 834 N.H. 1978
    See, e.g., Beaudoin v. Zaccardo, 117 N.H. 273, 371 A.2d 1174 (1977); R. J. Berke & Co, v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976); Britton v. Turner, 6 N.H. 481 (1834).
  • Dana A. Wein & Sons v. Keller 391 A.2d 878 N.H. 1978
    2d Contracts § 344 (1964); see R. J. Berke & Co. v. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976).
  • Cohen v. Frank Developers, Inc. 389 A.2d 933 N.H. 1978
    R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 764, 367 A.2d 583, 586 (1976).
  • R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc. 388 A.2d 1260 N.H. 1978
    This appeal is a continuation of Berke Co. v. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976), in which we affirmed a judgment for plaintiff Berke in the sum of $9,428.29.
  • Ekco Enterprises, Inc. v. Remi Fortin Construction, Inc. 382 A.2d 368 N.H. 1978
    R. J. Berke Co., Inc. v. J. P. Griffin Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976); Page v. Northeast Combustion Service, Inc., 113 N.H. 575, 311 A.2d 119 (1973); Packer v. Burditt, 104 N.H. 248, 182 A.2d 895 (1962).
  • Public Service Co. v. Town of Ashland 377 A.2d 124 N.H. 1977
    Berke v. Griffin, 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976); see Society for Protection of N.H. Forests v. Site Evaluation Comm., 115 N.H. 163, 173, 337 A.2d 778, 786-87 (1975).
  • Dandeneau v. Seymour 374 A.2d 934 N.H. 1977
    “Quantum meruit is a restitutionary remedy intended for use by contracting parties who are in material breach and thus unable to sue ‘on contract.’ ” Berke v. Griffin, 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 (1976).
  • Beaudoin v. Zaccardo 371 A.2d 1174 N.H. 1977
    R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583 *275 (1976); Britton v. Turner, 6 N.H. 481 (1834); 5 A. Corbin, Contracts § 1109 (1964).
  • Grant v. Town of Newton 370 A.2d 285 N.H. 1977
    It is not incumbent on the trier of fact to accept the damage schedule at face value.
  • Fitzgerald v. Sargent 371 A.2d 456 N.H. 1977
    The efficient administration of the judicial system of this state is impeded when this court is asked to consider virtually every adverse ruling rendered at the trial level (over forty briefed points in this case) and we once again commend to the attention of the bar our observations in Berke & Co. v. Griffin, Inc., 116 N.H. 760, 767, 367 A.2d 583, 588 (1976) and State v. Miller, 117 N.H. 67, 68-69, 369 A.2d 197, 198-99 (1977).