Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 355 A.2d 412.
-
Appeal of Walker
737 A.2d 677
N.H. 1999
RSA 541-A:35 (1997); cf. Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976), appeal after remand, 118 N.H. 640, 392 A.2d 156 (1978).
-
Appeal of Savage
737 A.2d 1109
N.H. 1999
RSA 541-A:35 (1997); cf. Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976), appeal after remand, 118 N.H. 640, 392 A.2d 156 (1978) (reviewing court needs findings of basic facts by agency to ascertain whether conclusions it reached were valid).
-
Appeal of Rainville
732 A.2d 406
N.H. 1999
Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976) (reviewing court needs findings of basic facts by the agency to ascertain whether the conclusions it reached were proper).
-
Appeal of Osram Sylvania, Inc.
706 A.2d 172
N.H. 1998
Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, *620 414 (1976).
-
Appeal of Tamm
469 A.2d 1291
N.H. 1983
Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148-49, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976).
-
Cheney v. City of Somersworth
441 A.2d 1172
N.H. 1982
Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976) (willful insubordination is refusal “to accede to a legitimate and reasonable demand of the employer”).
-
Foote v. State Personnel Commission
392 A.2d 156
N.H. 1978
Bois, J. This case is a sequel to Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976), in which we remanded the affirmance by the State personnel commission [hereinafter the commission] of the plaintiff’s dismissal from State employment.
-
Patenaude v. Town of Meredith
392 A.2d 582
N.H. 1978
Foote v. State Personnel Common, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976).
-
Dumais v. State Personnel Comission
386 A.2d 1269
N.H. 1978
Accordingly, the commission has voted to uphold the decision of the liquor commission in the discharge of Mr. Dumais.” See Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976) (court *311 needs findings of basic fact to effectuate its review over personnel commission decisions).
-
St. Johnsbury Trucking Co. v. State
385 A.2d 215
N.H. 1978
Bd., 117 N.H. 976, 380 A.2d 1085 (1977); Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976).
-
Ingersoll v. Williams
383 A.2d 1119
N.H. 1978
On remand, we direct the court’s attention to our decisions in Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976); Society for Protection of N.H. Forests v. Site Evaluation Comm., 115 N.H. 163, 337 A.2d 778 (1975); Alcorn v. Rochester Zoning Bd.
-
Colburn v. Personnel Commission
382 A.2d 907
N.H. 1978
His first contention is that *65 the commission’s findings of fact are insufficient to meet the standards set forth by this court in Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976).
-
New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration v. Public Employee Labor Relations Board
380 A.2d 1085
N.H. 1977
Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976); Society for Protection of N.H. Forests v. Site Evaluation Comm’n, 115 N.H. 163, 172-74, 337 A.2d 778, 786-87 (1975).
-
Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Board of Adjustment
376 A.2d 885
N.H. 1977
Gelinas v. Portsmouth, 97 N.H. 248, 250, 85 A.2d 896, 898 (1952); see Broderick v. Hunt, 77 N.H. 139, 142-43, 89 A. 302, 304-05 (1913); Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 116 N.H. 145, 148, 355 A.2d 412, 414 (1976).
-
McIntosh v. Personnel Commission
374 A.2d 436
N.H. 1977
We held in Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976), wherein the commission denied a state employee’s appeal without making any specific findings of fact at all, that such findings were necessary in order to enable this court to review the commission’s action.
-
Glynn v. New Hampshire Personnel Commission
372 A.2d 1303
N.H. 1976
Foote v. State Personnel Comm’n, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976).
-
Bernier v. Wheelock
365 A.2d 737
N.H. 1976
Finally, the plaintiff argues that we ought to remand this case, as was done in Foote v. State Personnel Commission, 116 N.H. 145, 355 A.2d 412 (1976), because the commission’s decision does not contain sufficient findings of fact.