DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Reno v. Town of Hopkinton, 349 A.2d 585.

14 citing documents.

  • Appeal of Raymond Cover 134 A.3d 433 N.H. 2016
    Finally, in Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 706-08 (1975), an action that did not involve a request for declaratory judgment, we held a rule invalid even though the promulgating agency was neither a party to the petitioner’s action nor the body that adjudicated the petitioner’s challenge in the first instance.
  • Appeal of Anderson 784 A.2d 1205 N.H. 2001
    The authority to promulgate rules and regulations “is designed only to permit the board to fill in the details to effectuate the purpose of the statute.” Reno v. Town of Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707 (1975).
  • Foster v. Town of Henniker 562 A.2d 163 N.H. 1989
    Reno v. Town of Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707-08, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975); McGraw, 18 N.H.B.J.
  • Rich v. Powell 544 A.2d 29 N.H. 1988
    The plaintiff concludes that the court must declare the nine-month rule invalid because it unlawfully detracts from and modifies the statutory *459 intent found in RSA 651:25.
  • Appeal of Monsieur Henri Wines, Ltd. 512 A.2d 415 N.H. 1986
    “Criteria and rules and regulations may properly be promulgated by administrative boards when so authorized by the legislature with proper *194 standards.” Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975).
  • In re Richard M. 497 A.2d 1200 N.H. 1985
    of Accountancy, 118 N.H. 567, 568, 391 A.2d 888, 889 (1978); Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975).
  • Appeal of Gallant 485 A.2d 1034 N.H. 1984
    of Accountancy, 118 N.H. 567, 568, 391 A.2d 888, 889 (1978) (citing Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975)); Opinion of the Justices, 121 N.H. 552, 557, 431 A.2d 783, 786 (1981).
  • Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp. 433 A.2d 1291 N.H. 1981
    When the legislature so authorizes, an agency may properly promulgate rules.
  • Opinion of the Justices 431 A.2d 783 N.H. 1981
    of Accountancy, 118 N.H. 567, 568, 391 A.2d 888, 889 (1978); Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975), and administrative rules which go beyond the filling in of details are invalid.
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Whaland 430 A.2d 174 N.H. 1981
    of Accountancy, 118 N.H. 567, 568, 391 A.2d 888, 889 (1978); Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975).
  • Appeal of John H. 419 A.2d 1084 N.H. 1980
    of Accountancy, 118 N.H. 567, 391 A.2d 888 (1978); Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 349 A.2d 585 (1975).
  • Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of Accountancy 391 A.2d 888 N.H. 1978
    The rule-making authority is granted to permit boards to fill in details to effectuate the purpose of the statute.
  • In Re Jack O'Lantern, Inc. 387 A.2d 1166 N.H. 1978
    An agency may not add to, change, or modify the statute by regulation or through case-by-case adjudication.
  • Blue Mountain Forest Ass'n v. Town of Croydon 373 A.2d 1313 N.H. 1977
    advisory board, pursuant to its statutory duty to adopt criteria by which to determine whether land is receiving silvicultural treatment, adopted regulations requiring, inter alia, that the “land shall be primarily used for the growing and harvesting of repeated forest crops.” This regulation must not do more than “fill in the details to effectuate the purpose of the statute.” Reno v. Hopkinton, 115 N.H. 706, 707, 349 A.2d 585, 586 (1975).