Cited by
Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 323 A.2d 906.
-
Brian Langevin & a. v. Travco Insurance Company
184 A.3d 80
N.H. 2018
Co., 149 N.H. 599, 602-03 (2003) (holding that, absent a health insurer’s contractual right to subrogation, plaintiff may receive both health insurance benefits and tortfeasor recovery); Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509 (1974) (observing that, under the collateral source rule, if a plaintiff is compensated in whole or in part for his damages by some source independent of the tortfeasor, he is still permitted to make full recovery against the tortfeasor).
-
Ashley Hayes v. Kenneth Avery & a.
N.H. 2015
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509 (1974).
-
Murray v. McNamara
113 A.3d 1159
N.H. 2015
Relying solely upon Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 512-13 (1974), and Lempke v. Dagenais, 130 N.H. 782, 792 (1988), the defendants contend that recovery for consequential damages in breach of warranty cases is disallowed.
-
Wolters v. American Republic Insurance
827 A.2d 197
N.H. 2003
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 510 (1974); see also 16 L. Russ & T. Segalla, Couch on Insurance 3d § 222:6, at 222-27 (2000).
-
A.B.C. Builders, Inc. v. American Mutual Insurance
661 A.2d 1187
N.H. 1995
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 512-13, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974) (quotation omitted).
-
M. Mooney Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
618 A.2d 793
N.H. 1992
at 412, 618 A.2d at 783 (citing Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 513, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974)).
-
Coakley v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
618 A.2d 777
N.H. 1992
Desrochers, 99 N.H. at 133, 106 A.2d at 199; see Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 513, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974) (where “there is a reason personal to the owner for restoring the original condition” of property, cost of restoration is a proper measure of damages, even if greater than the diminution of property’s value); see also RSA 481:1 (New Hampshire groundwater “constitutes a limited and, ther
-
Anderson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
594 A.2d 1293
N.H. 1991
Unlike payments received from a collateral source, see Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509, 323 A.2d 906, 909 (1974), those received from joint tort-feasors are subtracted from total liability, Saltzman v. Town of Kingston, 124 N.H. 515, 521, 475 A.2d 1, 4 (1984); see RSA 507:7-h (Supp. 1990).
-
Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Orthopedic Professional Ass'n
480 A.2d 840
N.H. 1984
.” Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509, 323 A.2d 906, 909 (1974).
-
Carson v. Maurer
424 A.2d 825
N.H. 1980
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509, 323 A.2d 906, 909 (1974).
-
Woodburn v. Chapman
379 A.2d 1038
N.H. 1977
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 323 A.2d 906 (1974).
-
Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co.
374 A.2d 929
N.H. 1977
The defendant relies on a tort case, Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 323 A.2d 906 (1974), involving damages to real property occasioned by flooding resulting from the breach of a dam.
-
Woodburn v. Chapman
363 A.2d 197
N.H. 1976
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 512-13, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974).
-
New England Power Co. v. Town of Littleton
326 A.2d 698
N.H. 1974
337, 356, 492 P.2d 147, 162 (1971); see Fusegni v. Portsmouth Housing Auth., 114 N.H. 207, 317 A.2d 580 (1974); Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 323 A.2d 906 (1974); 1 J. Bonbright, Valuation of Property 164(1937).