Cited by

Opinions in New Hampshire that cite Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 323 A.2d 906.

14 citing documents.

  • Brian Langevin & a. v. Travco Insurance Company 184 A.3d 80 N.H. 2018
    Co., 149 N.H. 599, 602-03 (2003) (holding that, absent a health insurer’s contractual right to subrogation, plaintiff may receive both health insurance benefits and tortfeasor recovery); Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509 (1974) (observing that, under the collateral source rule, if a plaintiff is compensated in whole or in part for his damages by some source independent of the tortfeasor, he is still permitted to make full recovery against the tortfeasor).
  • Ashley Hayes v. Kenneth Avery & a. N.H. 2015
    Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509 (1974).
  • Murray v. McNamara 113 A.3d 1159 N.H. 2015
    Relying solely upon Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 512-13 (1974), and Lempke v. Dagenais, 130 N.H. 782, 792 (1988), the defendants contend that recovery for consequential damages in breach of warranty cases is disallowed.
  • Wolters v. American Republic Insurance 827 A.2d 197 N.H. 2003
    Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 510 (1974); see also 16 L. Russ & T. Segalla, Couch on Insurance 3d § 222:6, at 222-27 (2000).
  • A.B.C. Builders, Inc. v. American Mutual Insurance 661 A.2d 1187 N.H. 1995
    Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 512-13, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974) (quotation omitted).
  • M. Mooney Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 618 A.2d 793 N.H. 1992
    at 412, 618 A.2d at 783 (citing Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 513, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974)).
  • Coakley v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. 618 A.2d 777 N.H. 1992
    Desrochers, 99 N.H. at 133, 106 A.2d at 199; see Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 513, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974) (where “there is a reason personal to the owner for restoring the original condition” of property, cost of restoration is a proper measure of damages, even if greater than the diminution of property’s value); see also RSA 481:1 (New Hampshire groundwater “constitutes a limited and, ther
  • Anderson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 594 A.2d 1293 N.H. 1991
    Unlike payments received from a collateral source, see Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509, 323 A.2d 906, 909 (1974), those received from joint tort-feasors are subtracted from total liability, Saltzman v. Town of Kingston, 124 N.H. 515, 521, 475 A.2d 1, 4 (1984); see RSA 507:7-h (Supp. 1990).
  • Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Orthopedic Professional Ass'n 480 A.2d 840 N.H. 1984
    .” Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509, 323 A.2d 906, 909 (1974).
  • Carson v. Maurer 424 A.2d 825 N.H. 1980
    Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 509, 323 A.2d 906, 909 (1974).
  • Woodburn v. Chapman 379 A.2d 1038 N.H. 1977
    Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 323 A.2d 906 (1974).
  • Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co. 374 A.2d 929 N.H. 1977
    The defendant relies on a tort case, Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 323 A.2d 906 (1974), involving damages to real property occasioned by flooding resulting from the breach of a dam.
  • Woodburn v. Chapman 363 A.2d 197 N.H. 1976
    Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 512-13, 323 A.2d 906, 911 (1974).
  • New England Power Co. v. Town of Littleton 326 A.2d 698 N.H. 1974
    337, 356, 492 P.2d 147, 162 (1971); see Fusegni v. Portsmouth Housing Auth., 114 N.H. 207, 317 A.2d 580 (1974); Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 114 N.H. 505, 323 A.2d 906 (1974); 1 J. Bonbright, Valuation of Property 164(1937).